From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCBBB7D67 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:51:42 +1100 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Christian Kujau Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 References: <20100314065526.GA5353@x200> <20100314112428.GA4142@x200> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:51:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Christian Kujau's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:46:07 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alexey Dobriyan , LKML List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Christian Kujau writes: > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 at 13:24, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> Post "find /proc/device-tree" output. > > I did upload[0] a tarball of /proc/device-tree, please see below the > "find" output. > > Indeed, there's a /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0/l2-cache and > /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0/l2-cache#1 in the device-tree. However, from looking at > the logfiles, the > > device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" That's a red herring, the real problem is this: name 'pulses/rev' Of course, this name cannot be found in /proc/device-tree, because it wasn't created. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."