From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Franz Sirl Cc: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [RFC] IPC64 with glibc-2.2 and linux-2.4 References: <00092421504403.01070@enzo.bigblue.local> <5.0.0.19.2.20000925110119.01fe1df0@mail.lauterbach.com> <5.0.0.19.2.20000925173113.02e31040@mail.lauterbach.com> Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) From: Ulrich Drepper Date: 25 Sep 2000 09:08:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: Franz Sirl's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:54:26 +0200" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Franz Sirl writes: > Well, changing compared to what? IPC_64 on PPC was never functional > so far, so there is no problem here. The IPC_64 structs on the other > archs have this, eg on sparc: I'm failing to see where you want to see ipc_perm64 included in the compilation environment unless you replace ipc_perm. There are no LFS variants for the SysV IPC functions. And then ipc_perm64 should be the same size as ipc_perm. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/