From: Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org>
To: "linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org"
<linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
LinuxPPC List <linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: G3 Upgrade Questions....
Date: 29 Jul 1999 15:30:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vhb37fdv.fsf@soma.andreas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:50:03 +0200 (CEST)"
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be> writes:
> Since the 750 is derived from the 603e, it scores 1 bogomips per MHz. The 604e
> does 2 bogomips per MHz.
This contradicts my readings:
processor : 0
cpu : 750
temperature : 67 C
clock : 297MHz
revision : 2.2
bogomips : 599.65
zero pages : total 0 (0Kb) current: 0 (0Kb) hits: 0/688 (0%)
machine : PowerBook
motherboard : AAPL,PowerBook1998 MacRISC
L2 cache : 1024K unified pipelined-syncro-burst
memory : 192MB
But I wouldn't be surprised if the second level cache would influence
the BogoMIPS value by a factor of two.
Andreas
--
"We show that all proposed quantum bit commitment schemes are insecure because
the sender, Alice, can almost always cheat successfully by using an
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen type of attack and delaying her measurement until she
opens her commitment." ( http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9603004 )
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-29 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87emhr7ocz.fsf@hades.nocrew.net>
1999-07-29 11:50 ` G3 Upgrade Questions Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-07-29 12:12 ` Stefan Berndtsson
1999-07-29 12:32 ` Chris Ridd
1999-07-29 12:55 ` Gabriel Paubert
1999-07-29 13:30 ` Andreas Bogk [this message]
1999-07-29 16:57 Ron Chmara
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-07-29 14:11 David DeHaven
1999-07-27 22:39 ian geiser
1999-07-28 0:09 ` Paul Mackerras
1999-07-28 22:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
1999-07-29 4:46 ` Takayuki Yamaizumi
1999-07-29 9:09 ` Adrian Cox
1999-07-30 1:38 ` Takayuki Yamaizumi
1999-07-30 11:38 ` Charles Lepple
1999-07-28 4:39 ` Neil Jolly
1999-07-28 12:53 ` ian reinhart geiser (ADMIN)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3vhb37fdv.fsf@soma.andreas.org \
--to=andreas@andreas.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).