* Re: Oops: machine check, sig: 7 [#1] - 16-bit Pccard - SOLVED!!!
From: Daniel Ritz @ 2006-04-09 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Edward Felberbaum; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-pcmcia, paulus
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F3E7D812AD1E707C145856ABC90@phx.gbl>
On Friday 07 April 2006 08.25, Edward Felberbaum wrote:
> >From: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch>
> >To: Edward Felberbaum <efelberbaum@hotmail.com>
> >CC: "linux-pcmcia" <linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org>
> >Subject: Re: Oops: machine check, sig: 7 [#1] - 16-bit Pccard - CardBus OK
> >Edward Felberbaum
> >Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:11:50 +0200
> >
> > > >Can you try booting with the boot parameter
> > > >
> > > >reserve=0xfd000000-0xfdffffff
> > > >
> > > >?
> >
> >errm...that should have been:
> > reserve=0xfd000000,0xffffff
> >ie. reserve=start,size
> >
> > >
> > > I added the above reserve to the boot parameters, it shows up on the
> >Kernel
> > > command line in dmesg, but dmesg still displays
> > >
> > > pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xfd000000 - 0xfdffffff
> > >
> > > I would have expected the above line to not appear - use a different
> >memory
> > > range due to the kernel command line "reserve".
> >
> >it will...:)
> >
> >rgds
> >-daniel
>
> I followed your advice and inserted a 3Com 589 card and there was NO Oops!
> WOW!
>
> I built the 3c589 driver and the card works too.
>
> Now I'm trying to get my Belkin F5D6020 v2 Wifi card to work.
>
> Thanks very much for your help!
>
> I see from the dmesg output from my original post that memory ranges
> 0xfdd7f000 and 0xfddff000 are used by the Gatwick and Heathrow mac io
> controllers. That explains the conflict with PCMCIA over 0xfd000000.
interesting...the memory ranges are used by other devices yet the
request_resource() call in PCMCIA succeeds,,,and PCI resources shoudn't
be there in the first place then...
ok, it's in file arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c...
i can't see any request_resource() calls in there...so CC'ing the PPC guys..
they can sure comment...
>
> Question, can I minimize the range of memory that is reserved 0xffffff - or
> is it a waste of time?
>
yeah, you probably could, but it sounds like a waste of time...
> Eddie
>
rgds
-daniel
^ permalink raw reply
* PRAMFS
From: Antonio Di Bacco @ 2006-04-09 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hi,
anyone knows if pramfs for kernel 2.4 is stable, anyone used it? When
downloading it I saw that the date is very old (2004). I saw people using
jffs2 on pram, but I think there is a big waste of memory in using it, isn't
it? My pram is only 512KB.
Bye,
Antonio.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Accessing physical memory
From: dwh @ 2006-04-09 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Di Bacco; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
In-Reply-To: <200604082352.55490.antonio.dibacco@aruba.it>
Quoting Antonio Di Bacco <antonio.dibacco@aruba.it>:
> How can I access the physical memory? Can I MMAP for example /dev/mem? Is
> there a simpler way?
>
Hi Antonio,
What would you like to do? If you just want some arbitrary
page of memory, then look at the 'nopage' example in Rubini,
or ask me and I'll send you some code.
If you want a specific memory location, then you'll need
to claim and ioremap the memory, and again, I can give you
some code.
So, explain a little more and I can help.
Dave
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Accessing physical memory
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2006-04-08 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
In-Reply-To: <200604082352.55490.antonio.dibacco@aruba.it>
On Saturday 08 April 2006 23:52, Antonio Di Bacco wrote:
> How can I access the physical memory? Can I MMAP for example /dev/mem? Is
> there a simpler way?
/dev/mem access is the most simple way. A cleaner solution is usually to
write your own simple character device driver for the stuff you want to
access in memory.
Depending on why you want to access memory, slram may be the right
driver, e.g. when you want to store a file system there.
Arnd <><
^ permalink raw reply
* Accessing physical memory
From: Antonio Di Bacco @ 2006-04-08 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
How can I access the physical memory? Can I MMAP for example /dev/mem? Is
there a simpler way?
Bye,
Antonio.
^ permalink raw reply
* slram
From: Antonio Di Bacco @ 2006-04-08 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Anyone knows what slram driver is meant for?
Bye,
Antonio.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver
From: Francois Romieu @ 2006-04-08 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linas Vepstas
Cc: Greg KH, linux-kernel, jesse.brandeburg, linuxppc-dev,
john.ronciak, jeffrey.t.kirsher, netdev, linux-pci, Jeff Garzik
In-Reply-To: <20060407231134.GN25225@austin.ibm.com>
Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com> :
> Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/drivers/net/e100.c 2006-04-07 16:21:46.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c 2006-04-07 18:10:52.411266545 -0500
[...]
> +static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_channel_state_t state)
80 cols limit.
[...]
> +static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "e100: Cannot re-enable PCI device after reset.\n");
- The driver supports {get/set}_msglevel. Please consider using netif_msg_xxx
(see include/linux/netdevice.h).
- s/e100/DRV_NAME/ (or netdev->name, or pci_name(...) depending on the
context).
[...]
> +static struct pci_error_handlers e100_err_handler = {
> + .error_detected = e100_io_error_detected,
> + .slot_reset = e100_io_slot_reset,
> + .resume = e100_io_resume,
> +};
Nit: I'd rather follow the style in the declaration of e100_driver.
--
Ueimor
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: freescale lite 5200 board and kernel 2.6
From: Matthias Fechner @ 2006-04-08 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
In-Reply-To: <20060406221056.GA15540@raptus.dandreoli.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 381 bytes --]
Hello Domenico,
* Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@gmail.com> [07-04-06 00:10]:
> kernel is built following the instructions on your wiki, i attached
> the config file. please have a look, let me know if any check/test may
> be advised.
sry, but I have now time to try your kernel config, but I attached
mine which is working fine for me.
Maybe this helps you.
Best regards,
Matthias
[-- Attachment #2: config-mpc52xx.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 4800 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2006-04-08 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linas Vepstas
Cc: Greg KH, linux-kernel, jesse.brandeburg, linuxppc-dev,
john.ronciak, jeffrey.t.kirsher, netdev, linux-pci, Jeff Garzik
In-Reply-To: <20060407231134.GN25225@austin.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:11:34PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/drivers/net/e100.c
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c
> + * @state: The current pci conneection state
connection
> +static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_channel_state_t state)
> +{
> + struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + /* Similar to calling e100_down(), but avoids adpater I/O. */
adapter
> +static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "e100: Cannot re-enable PCI device after reset.\n");
> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
> + }
> + pci_set_master(pdev);
> +
> + /* Only one device per card can do a reset */
> + if (0 != PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn))
Wrong order.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] tickless idle cpu: Skip ticks when CPU is idle
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2006-04-07 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vatsa; +Cc: sri_vatsa_v, linuxppc-dev
In-Reply-To: <20060407063131.GB22416@in.ibm.com>
Srivatsa Vaddagiri writes:
> diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power4.S~no_idle_hz arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power4.S
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power4.S~no_idle_hz 2006-04-07 04:14:39.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power4.S 2006-04-07 04:14:58.000000000 +0530
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_CAN_NAP)
> cmpwi 0,r4,0
> beqlr
>
> + mflr r4
> + bl .stop_hz_timer
> + mtlr r4
This won't work - r4 is volatile across function calls, that is,
stop_hz_timer() could change r4 and is not required to save and
restore it.
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver
From: Linas Vepstas @ 2006-04-07 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, jesse.brandeburg, linuxppc-dev,
john.ronciak, jeffrey.t.kirsher, linux-pci, Jeff Garzik
In-Reply-To: <20060406224643.GA6278@kroah.com>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:46:43PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:24:00PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > + if(pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
>
> Add a space after "if" and before "(" please.
I guess I'm immune to learning from experience. :-/
Here's a new improved patch.
--linas
[PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver
Various PCI bus errors can be signaled by newer PCI controllers. This
patch adds the PCI error recovery callbacks to the intel ethernet e100
device driver. The patch has been tested, and appears to work well.
Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@linas.org>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
----
drivers/net/e100.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/drivers/net/e100.c 2006-04-07 16:21:46.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/drivers/net/e100.c 2006-04-07 18:10:52.411266545 -0500
@@ -2780,6 +2780,80 @@ static void e100_shutdown(struct pci_dev
DPRINTK(PROBE,ERR, "Error enabling wake\n");
}
+/* ------------------ PCI Error Recovery infrastructure -------------- */
+/**
+ * e100_io_error_detected - called when PCI error is detected.
+ * @pdev: Pointer to PCI device
+ * @state: The current pci conneection state
+ */
+static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_channel_state_t state)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ /* Similar to calling e100_down(), but avoids adpater I/O. */
+ netdev->stop(netdev);
+
+ /* Detach; put netif into state similar to hotplug unplug. */
+ netif_poll_enable(netdev);
+ netif_device_detach(netdev);
+
+ /* Request a slot reset. */
+ return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;
+}
+
+/**
+ * e100_io_slot_reset - called after the pci bus has been reset.
+ * @pdev: Pointer to PCI device
+ *
+ * Restart the card from scratch.
+ */
+static pci_ers_result_t e100_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "e100: Cannot re-enable PCI device after reset.\n");
+ return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+ }
+ pci_set_master(pdev);
+
+ /* Only one device per card can do a reset */
+ if (0 != PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn))
+ return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
+ e100_hw_reset(nic);
+ e100_phy_init(nic);
+
+ return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
+}
+
+/**
+ * e100_io_resume - resume normal operations
+ * @pdev: Pointer to PCI device
+ *
+ * Resume normal operations after an error recovery
+ * sequence has been completed.
+ */
+static void e100_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ /* ack any pending wake events, disable PME */
+ pci_enable_wake(pdev, 0, 0);
+
+ netif_device_attach(netdev);
+ if (netif_running(netdev)) {
+ e100_open(netdev);
+ mod_timer(&nic->watchdog, jiffies);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct pci_error_handlers e100_err_handler = {
+ .error_detected = e100_io_error_detected,
+ .slot_reset = e100_io_slot_reset,
+ .resume = e100_io_resume,
+};
static struct pci_driver e100_driver = {
.name = DRV_NAME,
@@ -2791,6 +2865,7 @@ static struct pci_driver e100_driver = {
.resume = e100_resume,
#endif
.shutdown = e100_shutdown,
+ .err_handler = &e100_err_handler,
};
static int __init e100_init_module(void)
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] tickless idle cpu - Allow any CPU to update jiffies
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2006-04-07 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vatsa; +Cc: sri_vatsa_v, linuxppc-dev
In-Reply-To: <20060407063044.GA22416@in.ibm.com>
Srivatsa Vaddagiri writes:
> Currently, only boot CPU calls do_timer to update jiffies. This prevents
> idle boot CPU from skipping ticks. Patch below, against 2.6.17-rc1-mm1,
> allows jiffies to be updated from any CPU.
We have to be very careful here. The code that keeps xtime and
gettimeofday in sync relies on xtime being incremented as close as
possible in time to when the timebase passes specific values. Since
we currently stagger the timer interrupts for the cpus throughout a
jiffy, having cpus other than the boot cpus calling do_timer will
break this and introduce inaccuracies. There are also implications
for the stolen time accounting on shared-processor LPAR systems.
I think we need to remove the staggering, thus having all cpus take
their timer interrupt at the same time. That way, any of them can
call do_timer. However we then have to be much more careful about
possible contention, e.g. on xtime_lock. Your patch has every cpu
taking xtime_lock for writing rather than just the boot cpu. I'd like
to see if there is some way to avoid that (while still having just one
cpu call do_timer, of course).
Regards,
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply
* Virtex-4 FX12 Mini-Module support
From: Aidan Williams @ 2006-04-07 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
In-Reply-To: <4418EA57.6060308@petalogix.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]
Hi All,
I'm using the UQ powerpc uclinux code on the
Memec Virtex-4 FX12 Mini-Module Development Kit.
I have attached a patch with our modifications:
- switch to set cache policy (OFF, WriteThru, WriteBack)
- switch to enable PPC405 CPU_213 errata workaround
- cosmetic update to cputable
- view ccr0 register in /proc/cpu
The patch is against:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~pml/uclinux_powerpc/linuxppc-2.4-20051021.tgz
The specific modules/chips we're using have a silicon bug,
See the euphemistically named "Solution 13:"
http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xil_ans_display.jsp?iLanguageID=1&iCountryID=1&getPagePath=20658
The board boots and runs reliably with the caches OFF.
WriteThru and WriteBack caching cause memory corruption and
this is why we implemented the cache policy switch.
regards
aidan
____
:wq!
[-- Attachment #2: virtex-4-fx12-minimodule.txt --]
[-- Type: plain/text, Size: 23729 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: question about Linux 2.6 with Xilinx ML-403
From: Grant Likely @ 2006-04-07 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yding, linuxppc-embedded list
In-Reply-To: <4436BD2B.9050306@lnxw.com>
On 4/7/06, yding <yding@lnxw.com> wrote:
> HI, Grant,
>
> I found this message :
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=3D3841 on
> Internet.
> It looks like you created some patch files for supporting Linux 2.6 with
> Xilinx ML-403.
>
> how can download the whole kernel source tree with your patched files (vi=
a
> cvs or bitkeeper) ?
I believe they are now in Linus' mainline git tree. If not, they are
in Paul's powerpc git tree.
BTW, please CC the linuxppc-embedded mailing list when emailing me directly=
.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
(403) 399-0195
^ permalink raw reply
* [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: clear PCI failure counter if no new failures.
From: Linas Vepstas @ 2006-04-07 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-pci, linux-kernel
[PATCH] powerpc/pseries: clear PCI failure counter if no new failures.
The current PCI error recovery system keeps track of the number of
PCI card resets, and refuses to bring a card back up if this number
is too large. The goal of doing this was to avoid an infinite loop
of resets if a card is obviously dead. However, if the failures are
rare, but the machine has a high uptime, this mechanism might still
be triggered; this is too harsh.
This patch will avoids this problem by decrementing the fail count
after an hour. Thus, as long as a pci card BSOD's less than 6 times
an hour, it will continue to be reset indefinitely. If it's failure
rate is greater than that, it will be taken off-line permanently.
This patch is larger than it might otherwise be because it
changes indentation by removing a pointless while-loop. The while
loop is not needed, as the handler is invoked once fo each event
(by schedule_work()); the loop is leftover cruft from an earlier
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
----
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c | 13 +++---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_event.c | 60 +++++++++++++++-------------
include/asm-powerpc/eeh_event.h | 10 ++--
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c 2006-04-04 15:28:59.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_driver.c 2006-04-07 16:08:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -23,9 +23,8 @@
*
*/
#include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <asm/eeh.h>
#include <asm/eeh_event.h>
@@ -250,7 +249,7 @@ static int eeh_reset_device (struct pci_
*/
#define MAX_WAIT_FOR_RECOVERY 15
-void handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event *event)
+struct pci_dn * handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event *event)
{
struct device_node *frozen_dn;
struct pci_dn *frozen_pdn;
@@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ void handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event
if (!frozen_dn) {
printk(KERN_ERR "EEH: Error: Cannot find partition endpoint for %s\n",
pci_name(event->dev));
- return;
+ return NULL;
}
/* There are two different styles for coming up with the PE.
@@ -280,7 +279,7 @@ void handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event
if (!frozen_bus) {
printk(KERN_ERR "EEH: Cannot find PCI bus for %s\n",
frozen_dn->full_name);
- return;
+ return NULL;
}
#if 0
@@ -355,7 +354,7 @@ void handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event
/* Tell all device drivers that they can resume operations */
pci_walk_bus(frozen_bus, eeh_report_resume, NULL);
- return;
+ return frozen_pdn;
excess_failures:
/*
@@ -384,6 +383,8 @@ perm_error:
/* Shut down the device drivers for good. */
pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus);
+
+ return NULL;
}
/* ---------- end of file ---------- */
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_event.c 2006-04-04 15:28:59.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_event.c 2006-04-05 09:56:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2005 Linas Vepstas <linas@linas.org>
*/
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
@@ -56,38 +57,43 @@ static int eeh_event_handler(void * dumm
{
unsigned long flags;
struct eeh_event *event;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
daemonize ("eehd");
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- while (1) {
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&eeh_eventlist_lock, flags);
+ event = NULL;
+
+ /* Unqueue the event, get ready to process. */
+ if (!list_empty(&eeh_eventlist)) {
+ event = list_entry(eeh_eventlist.next, struct eeh_event, list);
+ list_del(&event->list);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eeh_eventlist_lock, flags);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&eeh_eventlist_lock, flags);
- event = NULL;
+ if (event == NULL)
+ return 0;
- /* Unqueue the event, get ready to process. */
- if (!list_empty(&eeh_eventlist)) {
- event = list_entry(eeh_eventlist.next, struct eeh_event, list);
- list_del(&event->list);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eeh_eventlist_lock, flags);
-
- if (event == NULL)
- break;
-
- /* Serialize processing of EEH events */
- mutex_lock(&eeh_event_mutex);
- eeh_mark_slot(event->dn, EEH_MODE_RECOVERING);
-
- printk(KERN_INFO "EEH: Detected PCI bus error on device %s\n",
- pci_name(event->dev));
-
- handle_eeh_events(event);
-
- eeh_clear_slot(event->dn, EEH_MODE_RECOVERING);
- pci_dev_put(event->dev);
- kfree(event);
- mutex_unlock(&eeh_event_mutex);
+ /* Serialize processing of EEH events */
+ mutex_lock(&eeh_event_mutex);
+ eeh_mark_slot(event->dn, EEH_MODE_RECOVERING);
+
+ printk(KERN_INFO "EEH: Detected PCI bus error on device %s\n",
+ pci_name(event->dev));
+
+ pdn = handle_eeh_events(event);
+
+ eeh_clear_slot(event->dn, EEH_MODE_RECOVERING);
+ pci_dev_put(event->dev);
+ kfree(event);
+ mutex_unlock(&eeh_event_mutex);
+
+ /* If there are no new errors after an hour, clear the counter. */
+ if (pdn && pdn->eeh_freeze_count>0) {
+ msleep_interruptible (3600*1000);
+ if (pdn->eeh_freeze_count>0)
+ pdn->eeh_freeze_count--;
}
return 0;
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/include/asm-powerpc/eeh_event.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/eeh_event.h 2006-03-19 23:53:29.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/include/asm-powerpc/eeh_event.h 2006-04-04 15:37:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
* Copyright (c) 2005 Linas Vepstas <linas@linas.org>
*/
-#ifndef ASM_PPC64_EEH_EVENT_H
-#define ASM_PPC64_EEH_EVENT_H
+#ifndef ASM_POWERPC_EEH_EVENT_H
+#define ASM_POWERPC_EEH_EVENT_H
#ifdef __KERNEL__
/** EEH event -- structure holding pci controller data that describes
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct eeh_event {
* @dev pci device
*
* This routine builds a PCI error event which will be delivered
- * to all listeners on the peh_notifier_chain.
+ * to all listeners on the eeh_notifier_chain.
*
* This routine can be called within an interrupt context;
* the actual event will be delivered in a normal context
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ int eeh_send_failure_event (struct devic
int time_unavail);
/* Main recovery function */
-void handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event *);
+struct pci_dn * handle_eeh_events (struct eeh_event *);
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-#endif /* ASM_PPC64_EEH_EVENT_H */
+#endif /* ASM_POWERPC_EEH_EVENT_H */
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: export symbols for page size selection
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2006-04-07 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cbe-oss-dev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Mark Nutter
In-Reply-To: <20060407162026.GK952@pb15.lixom.net>
On Friday 07 April 2006 18:20, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:03:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 07 April 2006 17:42, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > Yeah, what's the need for that, really? It needs to know so much of
> > > kernel internals that it's getting silly to allow it to be a module.
> >
> > How about if I do a patch that always includes the base but not
> > the actual file system?
>
> Sounds like a decent tradeoff.
>
Unfortunately, this one doesn't get rid of the need to have the
exports, since the context switch code also needs mmu_psize_defs
and the associated objects. I think I have to come up with
a different change for that, but I don't mind putting the base
stuff into the kernel in the first place.
Mark has some changes to the file layout pending that will
impact this as well. I first need to see how that works out
together.
The patch to make the base non-modular is trivial, so we might
as well apply it now.
Arnd <><
Index: linus-2.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linus-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile
+++ linus-2.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile
@@ -2,15 +2,13 @@ obj-y += interrupt.o iommu.o setup.o s
obj-y += pervasive.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SPU_FS) += spu-base.o spufs/
-
-spu-base-y += spu_base.o spu_priv1.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SPU_FS) += spufs/
# needed only when building loadable spufs.ko
spufs-modular-$(CONFIG_SPU_FS) += spu_syscalls.o
obj-y += $(spufs-modular-m)
# always needed in kernel
-spufs-builtin-$(CONFIG_SPU_FS) += spu_callbacks.o
+spufs-builtin-$(CONFIG_SPU_FS) += spu_callbacks.o spu_base.o spu_priv1.o
obj-y += $(spufs-builtin-y) $(spufs-builtin-m)
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: export symbols for page size selection
From: Olof Johansson @ 2006-04-07 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, cbe-oss-dev
In-Reply-To: <200604071803.01836.arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:03:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 07 April 2006 17:42, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Yeah, what's the need for that, really? It needs to know so much of
> > kernel internals that it's getting silly to allow it to be a module.
>
> How about if I do a patch that always includes the base but not
> the actual file system?
Sounds like a decent tradeoff.
-Olof
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: export symbols for page size selection
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2006-04-07 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cbe-oss-dev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
In-Reply-To: <20060407154247.GJ952@pb15.lixom.net>
On Friday 07 April 2006 17:42, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Yeah, what's the need for that, really? It needs to know so much of
> kernel internals that it's getting silly to allow it to be a module.
>
It's still quite handy to have the actual file system as a module,
because
a) the module is rather bloated atm, it's about 200kb including the
embedded spu code that it runs for context switch. I don't want
to burden the generic distros with that
b) It simplifies development a bit to not have to reload the whole
kernel when making changes. Booting with all the HW debugger stuff
enabled takes quite a bit of time, especially when you have to
tunnel the binaries through our internal network ;-).
We currently have two modules, and the base module has most of the
stuff that has dependencies on exported symbols. The binary is
25k on my system (with some debugging options enabled).
How about if I do a patch that always includes the base but not
the actual file system?
Arnd <><
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: export symbols for page size selection
From: Geoff Levand @ 2006-04-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olof Johansson; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linuxppc-dev, cbe-oss-dev
In-Reply-To: <20060407154247.GJ952@pb15.lixom.net>
Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:28:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:00:04AM +0200, arnd@arndb.de wrote:
>> > We need access to some symbols in powerpc memory management
>> > from spufs in order to create proper SLB entries.
>>
>> One more reason to disallow modular spufs..
>
> Yeah, what's the need for that, really? It needs to know so much of
> kernel internals that it's getting silly to allow it to be a module.
We never used that feature either...
-Geoff
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: export symbols for page size selection
From: Olof Johansson @ 2006-04-07 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, cbe-oss-dev, Arnd Bergmann
In-Reply-To: <20060407152813.GA382@lst.de>
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:28:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:00:04AM +0200, arnd@arndb.de wrote:
> > We need access to some symbols in powerpc memory management
> > from spufs in order to create proper SLB entries.
>
> One more reason to disallow modular spufs..
Yeah, what's the need for that, really? It needs to know so much of
kernel internals that it's getting silly to allow it to be a module.
-Olof
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: export symbols for page size selection
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2006-04-07 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arnd; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Paul Mackerras, cbe-oss-dev, Arnd Bergmann
In-Reply-To: <20060407150743.688538000@dyn-9-152-242-103.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:00:04AM +0200, arnd@arndb.de wrote:
> We need access to some symbols in powerpc memory management
> from spufs in order to create proper SLB entries.
One more reason to disallow modular spufs..
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: RTC/I2C on 82xx with Linux 2.6.x
From: Mark A. Greer @ 2006-04-07 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claus Gindhart; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
In-Reply-To: <200604071057.26265.claus.gindhart@kontron-modular.com>
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Claus Gindhart wrote:
> Laurent,
>
> attached you find a rtc-driver for 2.6.13.
> I ported it from 2.4 myself, because i didnt find any 2.6-port out in the
> world.
> the ppc_md-structure entries are initialized within the driver itself. This is
> propably not 100% consistent with the coding conventions, but it works fro
> me.
> This i2c-layer can still be used with this driver; i have a LM75 and an EEPROM
> on the same bus, which i operate via LM-Sensors and the i2c-dev driver.
Note that there is a drivers/rtc directory that new (and old) rtc drivers
should be ported to.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply
* [PATCH 0/5] cell: recent bug fixes
From: arnd @ 2006-04-07 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, cbe-oss-dev
This set of patches is mostly about making it possible to use
64k pages on the Cell platform, which did not work because
of a number of bugs.
Paulus, please apply to your bugfix tree.
Arnd <><
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] tickless idle cpu: Skip ticks when CPU is idle
From: Kumar Gala @ 2006-04-07 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vatsa; +Cc: sri_vatsa_v, paulus, linuxppc-dev
In-Reply-To: <20060407063131.GB22416@in.ibm.com>
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:31 AM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> This is the core patch which skips ticks when a CPU is idle.
> Should work on pSeries, pmac and maple machines.
>
> The patch is against 2.6.17-rc1-mm1 and has been tested on a 16-way
> (with SMT)
> Power5 box (p570).
>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
>
> ---
>
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 6
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power4.S | 3
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 3
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c |
> 150 ++++++++---
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 1
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 6
> linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/include/asm-powerpc/time.h | 8
> 7 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
[snip]
> diff -puN arch/powerpc/Kconfig~no_idle_hz arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/powerpc/Kconfig~no_idle_hz 2006-04-07
> 04:14:39.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-root/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2006-04-07
> 04:14:58.000000000 +0530
> @@ -593,6 +593,12 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
>
> Say N if you are unsure.
>
> +config NO_IDLE_HZ
> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && (PPC_PSERIES || PPC_PMAC || PPC_MAPLE)
> + bool "Switch off timer ticks on idle CPUs"
> + help
> + Switches the HZ timer interrupts off when a CPU is idle.
> +
any reason not to provide this for all 6xx class processors?
> config KEXEC
> bool "kexec system call (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on PPC_MULTIPLATFORM && EXPERIMENTAL
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH] spufs: fix compile
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2006-04-07 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arndb; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
In-Reply-To: <20060406134810.GB8552@lst.de>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:48:10PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The current tree isn't exctly sure about the arguments to
> alloc_spu_context, let it agree on the no-arguments version.
Please ignore all these patches, I had a messed up tree.
^ permalink raw reply
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox