* [PATCH v3 02/52] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback registration functions
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra,
Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, Oleg Nesterov, tj, Toshi Kani, Thomas Gleixner,
paulmck, Andrew Morton
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
The following method of CPU hotplug callback registration is not safe
due to the possibility of an ABBA deadlock involving the cpu_add_remove_lock
and the cpu_hotplug.lock.
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
The deadlock is shown below:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
Acquire cpu_hotplug.lock
[via get_online_cpus()]
CPU online/offline operation
takes cpu_add_remove_lock
[via cpu_maps_update_begin()]
Try to acquire
cpu_add_remove_lock
[via register_cpu_notifier()]
CPU online/offline operation
tries to acquire cpu_hotplug.lock
[via cpu_hotplug_begin()]
*** DEADLOCK! ***
The problem here is that callback registration takes the locks in one order
whereas the CPU hotplug operations take the same locks in the opposite order.
To avoid this issue and to provide a race-free method to register CPU hotplug
callbacks (along with initialization of already online CPUs), introduce new
variants of the callback registration APIs that simply register the callbacks
without holding the cpu_add_remove_lock during the registration. That way,
we can avoid the ABBA scenario. However, we will need to hold the
cpu_add_remove_lock throughout the entire critical section, to protect updates
to the callback/notifier chain.
This can be achieved by writing the callback registration code as follows:
cpu_maps_update_begin(); [ or cpu_notifier_register_begin(); see below ]
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* This doesn't take the cpu_add_remove_lock */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_maps_update_done(); [ or cpu_notifier_register_done(); see below ]
Note that we can't use get_online_cpus() here instead of cpu_maps_update_begin()
because the cpu_hotplug.lock is dropped during the invocation of CPU_POST_DEAD
notifiers, and hence get_online_cpus() cannot provide the necessary
synchronization to protect the callback/notifier chains against concurrent
reads and writes. On the other hand, since the cpu_add_remove_lock protects
the entire hotplug operation (including CPU_POST_DEAD), we can use
cpu_maps_update_begin/done() to guarantee proper synchronization.
Also, since cpu_maps_update_begin/done() is like a super-set of
get/put_online_cpus(), the former naturally protects the critical sections
from concurrent hotplug operations.
Since the names cpu_maps_update_begin/done() don't make much sense in CPU
hotplug callback registration scenarios, we'll introduce new APIs named
cpu_notifier_register_begin/done() and map them to cpu_maps_update_begin/done().
In summary, introduce the lockless variants of un/register_cpu_notifier() and
also export the cpu_notifier_register_begin/done() APIs for use by modules.
This way, we provide a race-free way to register hotplug callbacks as well as
perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/cpu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 03e235ad..488d6eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -122,26 +122,46 @@ enum {
{ .notifier_call = fn, .priority = pri }; \
register_cpu_notifier(&fn##_nb); \
}
+
+#define __cpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
+ static struct notifier_block fn##_nb = \
+ { .notifier_call = fn, .priority = pri }; \
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&fn##_nb); \
+}
#else /* #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || !defined(MODULE) */
#define cpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
+#define __cpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
#endif /* #else #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || !defined(MODULE) */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
extern int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+extern int __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
extern void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+extern void __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
#else
#ifndef MODULE
extern int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+extern int __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
#else
static inline int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return 0;
}
+
+static inline int __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
static inline void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
}
+
+static inline void __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+}
#endif
int cpu_up(unsigned int cpu);
@@ -149,19 +169,32 @@ void notify_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
extern void cpu_maps_update_begin(void);
extern void cpu_maps_update_done(void);
+#define cpu_notifier_register_begin cpu_maps_update_begin
+#define cpu_notifier_register_done cpu_maps_update_done
+
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
#define cpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
+#define __cpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
static inline int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return 0;
}
+static inline int __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
}
+static inline void __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+}
+
static inline void cpu_maps_update_begin(void)
{
}
@@ -170,6 +203,14 @@ static inline void cpu_maps_update_done(void)
{
}
+static inline void cpu_notifier_register_begin(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void cpu_notifier_register_done(void)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
extern struct bus_type cpu_subsys;
@@ -183,8 +224,11 @@ extern void put_online_cpus(void);
extern void cpu_hotplug_disable(void);
extern void cpu_hotplug_enable(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
+#define __hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) __cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) register_cpu_notifier(nb)
+#define __register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) __register_cpu_notifier(nb)
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
+#define __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) __unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
@@ -197,9 +241,12 @@ static inline void cpu_hotplug_done(void) {}
#define cpu_hotplug_disable() do { } while (0)
#define cpu_hotplug_enable() do { } while (0)
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
+#define __hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
/* These aren't inline functions due to a GCC bug. */
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) ({ (void)(nb); 0; })
+#define __register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) ({ (void)(nb); 0; })
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) ({ (void)(nb); })
+#define __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) ({ (void)(nb); })
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 33caf5e..a9e710e 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -28,18 +28,23 @@
static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_add_remove_lock);
/*
- * The following two API's must be used when attempting
- * to serialize the updates to cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask.
+ * The following two APIs (cpu_maps_update_begin/done) must be used when
+ * attempting to serialize the updates to cpu_online_mask & cpu_present_mask.
+ * The APIs cpu_notifier_register_begin/done() must be used to protect CPU
+ * hotplug callback (un)registration performed using __register_cpu_notifier()
+ * or __unregister_cpu_notifier().
*/
void cpu_maps_update_begin(void)
{
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_notifier_register_begin);
void cpu_maps_update_done(void)
{
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_notifier_register_done);
static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain);
@@ -183,6 +188,11 @@ int __ref register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
return ret;
}
+int __ref __register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ return raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
+}
+
static int __cpu_notify(unsigned long val, void *v, int nr_to_call,
int *nr_calls)
{
@@ -206,6 +216,7 @@ static void cpu_notify_nofail(unsigned long val, void *v)
BUG_ON(cpu_notify(val, v));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__register_cpu_notifier);
void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
@@ -215,6 +226,12 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
+void __ref __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__unregister_cpu_notifier);
+
/**
* clear_tasks_mm_cpumask - Safely clear tasks' mm_cpumask for a CPU
* @cpu: a CPU id
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 03/52] Doc/cpu-hotplug: Specify race-free way to register CPU hotplug callbacks
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Rob Landley, linux-pm, linux-doc,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck,
Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Recommend the usage of the new CPU hotplug callback registration APIs
(__register_cpu_notifier() etc), when subsystems need to also perform
initialization for already online CPUs. Provide examples of correct
and race-free ways of achieving this, and point out the kinds of code
that are error-prone.
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
index be675d2..a0b005d 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -312,12 +312,57 @@ things will happen if a notifier in path sent a BAD notify code.
Q: I don't see my action being called for all CPUs already up and running?
A: Yes, CPU notifiers are called only when new CPUs are on-lined or offlined.
If you need to perform some action for each cpu already in the system, then
+ do this:
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, CPU_UP_PREPARE, i);
foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, CPU_ONLINE, i);
}
+ However, if you want to register a hotplug callback, as well as perform
+ some initialization for CPUs that are already online, then do this:
+
+ Version 1: (Correct)
+ ---------
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+ foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier,
+ CPU_UP_PREPARE, i);
+ foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier,
+ CPU_ONLINE, i);
+ }
+
+ /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
+ Note that the following code is *NOT* the right way to achieve this,
+ because it is prone to an ABBA deadlock between the cpu_add_remove_lock
+ and the cpu_hotplug.lock.
+
+ Version 2: (Wrong!)
+ ---------
+
+ get_online_cpus();
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+ foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier,
+ CPU_UP_PREPARE, i);
+ foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier,
+ CPU_ONLINE, i);
+ }
+
+ register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
+
+ put_online_cpus();
+
+ So always use the first version shown above when you want to register
+ callbacks as well as initialize the already online CPUs.
+
+
Q: If i would like to develop cpu hotplug support for a new architecture,
what do i need at a minimum?
A: The following are what is required for CPU hotplug infrastructure to work
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 01/52] CPU hotplug: Add lockdep annotations to get/put_online_cpus()
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, Gautham R. Shenoy, walken, linux, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck,
Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
From: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add lockdep annotations for get/put_online_cpus() and
cpu_hotplug_begin()/cpu_hotplug_end().
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index deff2e6..33caf5e 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include "smpboot.h"
@@ -57,17 +58,30 @@ static struct {
* an ongoing cpu hotplug operation.
*/
int refcount;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ struct lockdep_map dep_map;
+#endif
} cpu_hotplug = {
.active_writer = NULL,
.lock = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(cpu_hotplug.lock),
.refcount = 0,
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ .dep_map = {.name = "cpu_hotplug.lock" },
+#endif
};
+/* Lockdep annotations for get/put_online_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_begin/end() */
+#define cpuhp_lock_acquire_read() lock_map_acquire_read(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
+#define cpuhp_lock_acquire() lock_map_acquire(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
+#define cpuhp_lock_release() lock_map_release(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
+
void get_online_cpus(void)
{
might_sleep();
if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
return;
+ cpuhp_lock_acquire_read();
mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
cpu_hotplug.refcount++;
mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
@@ -87,6 +101,7 @@ void put_online_cpus(void)
if (!--cpu_hotplug.refcount && unlikely(cpu_hotplug.active_writer))
wake_up_process(cpu_hotplug.active_writer);
mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ cpuhp_lock_release();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(put_online_cpus);
@@ -117,6 +132,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
{
cpu_hotplug.active_writer = current;
+ cpuhp_lock_acquire();
for (;;) {
mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
if (likely(!cpu_hotplug.refcount))
@@ -131,6 +147,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_done(void)
{
cpu_hotplug.active_writer = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ cpuhp_lock_release();
}
/*
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 04/52] CPU hotplug, perf: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the perf subsystem's hotplug notifier by using this latter form of
callback registration.
Also provide a bare-bones version of perf_cpu_notifier() that doesn't
invoke the notifiers for the already online CPUs. This would be useful
for subsystems that need to perform a different set of initialization
for the already online CPUs, or don't need the initialization altogether.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index e56b07f..3356abc 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -835,6 +835,8 @@ do { \
{ .notifier_call = fn, .priority = CPU_PRI_PERF }; \
unsigned long cpu = smp_processor_id(); \
unsigned long flags; \
+ \
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin(); \
fn(&fn##_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_UP_PREPARE, \
(void *)(unsigned long)cpu); \
local_irq_save(flags); \
@@ -843,9 +845,21 @@ do { \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
fn(&fn##_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_ONLINE, \
(void *)(unsigned long)cpu); \
- register_cpu_notifier(&fn##_nb); \
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&fn##_nb); \
+ cpu_notifier_register_done(); \
} while (0)
+/*
+ * Bare-bones version of perf_cpu_notifier(), which doesn't invoke the
+ * callback for already online CPUs.
+ */
+#define __perf_cpu_notifier(fn) \
+do { \
+ static struct notifier_block fn##_nb = \
+ { .notifier_call = fn, .priority = CPU_PRI_PERF }; \
+ \
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&fn##_nb); \
+} while (0)
struct perf_pmu_events_attr {
struct device_attribute attr;
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 05/52] ia64, salinfo: Fix hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
Fenghua Yu, linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
linux-ia64, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the salinfo code in ia64 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c
index 960a396..ee9719e 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c
@@ -635,6 +635,8 @@ salinfo_init(void)
(void *)salinfo_entries[i].feature);
}
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(salinfo_log_name); i++) {
data = salinfo_data + i;
data->type = i;
@@ -669,7 +671,9 @@ salinfo_init(void)
salinfo_timer.function = &salinfo_timeout;
add_timer(&salinfo_timer);
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&salinfo_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&salinfo_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 06/52] ia64, palinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
Fenghua Yu, linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
linux-ia64, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the palinfo code in ia64 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c
index ab33328..c39c3cd 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c
@@ -996,13 +996,17 @@ palinfo_init(void)
if (!palinfo_dir)
return -ENOMEM;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/* Create palinfo dirs in /proc for all online cpus */
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
create_palinfo_proc_entries(i);
}
/* Register for future delivery via notify registration */
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&palinfo_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&palinfo_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 07/52] ia64, topology: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
Fenghua Yu, linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
linux-ia64, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the topology code in ia64 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
index ca69a5a..f295f9a 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -454,12 +454,16 @@ static int __init cache_sysfs_init(void)
{
int i;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
struct device *sys_dev = get_cpu_device((unsigned int)i);
cache_add_dev(sys_dev);
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&cache_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&cache_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 08/52] ia64, err-inject: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
Fenghua Yu, linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
linux-ia64, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the error injection code in ia64 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c
index f59c0b8..0c161ed 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c
@@ -269,12 +269,17 @@ err_inject_init(void)
#ifdef ERR_INJ_DEBUG
printk(KERN_INFO "Enter error injection driver.\n");
#endif
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err_inject_cpu_callback(&err_inject_cpu_notifier, CPU_ONLINE,
(void *)(long)i);
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&err_inject_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&err_inject_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
@@ -288,11 +293,17 @@ err_inject_exit(void)
#ifdef ERR_INJ_DEBUG
printk(KERN_INFO "Exit error injection driver.\n");
#endif
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
sys_dev = get_cpu_device(i);
sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &err_inject_attr_group);
}
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&err_inject_cpu_notifier);
+
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&err_inject_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
module_init(err_inject_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 09/52] arm, hw-breakpoint: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, Russell King, linux-pm, Will Deacon,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck,
Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the hw-breakpoint code in arm by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 3d44660..3702de8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -1072,6 +1072,8 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
core_num_brps = get_num_brps();
core_num_wrps = get_num_wrps();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/*
* We need to tread carefully here because DBGSWENABLE may be
* driven low on this core and there isn't an architected way to
@@ -1088,6 +1090,7 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
if (!cpumask_empty(&debug_err_mask)) {
core_num_brps = 0;
core_num_wrps = 0;
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
@@ -1107,7 +1110,10 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
TRAP_HWBKPT, "breakpoint debug exception");
/* Register hotplug and PM notifiers. */
- register_cpu_notifier(&dbg_reset_nb);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&dbg_reset_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
pm_init();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 10/52] arm, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, Russell King, kvm, linux-pm,
Gleb Natapov, linux-kernel, kvmarm, linuxppc-dev,
linux-arm-kernel, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, Paolo Bonzini, paulmck,
Ingo Molnar, Christoffer Dall
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the kvm code in arm by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index bd18bb8..f0e50a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1051,21 +1051,26 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
}
}
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
err = init_hyp_mode();
if (err)
goto out_err;
- err = register_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb);
+ err = __register_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb);
if (err) {
kvm_err("Cannot register HYP init CPU notifier (%d)\n", err);
goto out_err;
}
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
hyp_cpu_pm_init();
kvm_coproc_table_init();
return 0;
out_err:
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return err;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 11/52] s390, cacheinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-s390,
Heiko Carstens, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Martin Schwidefsky
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the cacheinfo code in s390 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/cache.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/cache.c b/arch/s390/kernel/cache.c
index 3a414c0..c0b03c2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/cache.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/cache.c
@@ -378,9 +378,12 @@ static int __init cache_init(void)
if (!test_facility(34))
return 0;
cache_build_info();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
cache_add_cpu(cpu);
- hotcpu_notifier(cache_hotplug, 0);
+ __hotcpu_notifier(cache_hotplug, 0);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
device_initcall(cache_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 12/52] s390, smp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-s390,
Heiko Carstens, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck,
Martin Schwidefsky
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the smp code in s390 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
index a7125b6..e10be35 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1057,19 +1057,24 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, 0200, NULL, rescan_store);
static int __init s390_smp_init(void)
{
- int cpu, rc;
+ int cpu, rc = 0;
- hotcpu_notifier(smp_cpu_notify, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
rc = device_create_file(cpu_subsys.dev_root, &dev_attr_rescan);
if (rc)
return rc;
#endif
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
rc = smp_add_present_cpu(cpu);
if (rc)
- return rc;
+ goto out;
}
- return 0;
+
+ __hotcpu_notifier(smp_cpu_notify, 0);
+
+out:
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+ return rc;
}
subsys_initcall(s390_smp_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 13/52] sparc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, sparclinux, walken, linux, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, David S. Miller, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the sysfs code in sparc by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
index c21c673..a364000 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
check_mmu_stats();
- register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu);
@@ -310,6 +310,10 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
register_cpu_online(cpu);
}
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 14/52] powerpc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Olof Johansson,
linux-kernel, Wang Dongsheng, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, linuxppc-dev,
Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the sysfs code in powerpc by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Acked-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
index 97e1dc9..d90d4b7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -975,7 +975,8 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
int cpu;
register_nodes();
- register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu);
@@ -999,6 +1000,11 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
if (cpu_online(cpu))
register_cpu_online(cpu);
}
+
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
sysfs_create_dscr_default();
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 15/52] x86, msr: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the msr code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/msr.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
index 05266b5..c9603ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
@@ -259,14 +259,15 @@ static int __init msr_init(void)
goto out_chrdev;
}
msr_class->devnode = msr_devnode;
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err = msr_device_create(i);
if (err != 0)
goto out_class;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
err = 0;
goto out;
@@ -275,7 +276,7 @@ out_class:
i = 0;
for_each_online_cpu(i)
msr_device_destroy(i);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
class_destroy(msr_class);
out_chrdev:
__unregister_chrdev(MSR_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/msr");
@@ -286,13 +287,14 @@ out:
static void __exit msr_exit(void)
{
int cpu = 0;
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
msr_device_destroy(cpu);
class_destroy(msr_class);
__unregister_chrdev(MSR_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/msr");
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
module_init(msr_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 16/52] x86, cpuid: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the cpuid code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
index 7d9481c..3225ae6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
@@ -198,14 +198,15 @@ static int __init cpuid_init(void)
goto out_chrdev;
}
cpuid_class->devnode = cpuid_devnode;
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err = cpuid_device_create(i);
if (err != 0)
goto out_class;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
err = 0;
goto out;
@@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ out_class:
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
cpuid_device_destroy(i);
}
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
class_destroy(cpuid_class);
out_chrdev:
__unregister_chrdev(CPUID_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/cpuid");
@@ -227,13 +228,13 @@ static void __exit cpuid_exit(void)
{
int cpu = 0;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
cpuid_device_destroy(cpu);
class_destroy(cpuid_class);
__unregister_chrdev(CPUID_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/cpuid");
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
module_init(cpuid_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 17/52] x86, vsyscall: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the vsyscall code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
index 1f96f93..556eaf2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -393,9 +393,13 @@ static int __init vsyscall_init(void)
{
BUG_ON(VSYSCALL_ADDR(0) != __fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_FIRST_PAGE));
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
on_each_cpu(cpu_vsyscall_init, NULL, 1);
/* notifier priority > KVM */
- hotcpu_notifier(cpu_vsyscall_notifier, 30);
+ __hotcpu_notifier(cpu_vsyscall_notifier, 30);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 18/52] x86, intel, uncore: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the uncore code in intel-x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index c88f7f4..e90183d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -3816,7 +3816,7 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
@@ -3835,9 +3835,9 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
}
on_each_cpu(uncore_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
- register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 19/52] x86, mce: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
H. Peter Anvin, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar,
linux-edac
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the mce code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 4d5419b..9b7734b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -2434,14 +2434,18 @@ static __init int mcheck_init_device(void)
if (err)
return err;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err = mce_device_create(i);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return err;
+ }
}
register_syscore_ops(&mce_syscore_ops);
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
/* register character device /dev/mcelog */
misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 20/52] x86, therm_throt.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
H. Peter Anvin, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar,
linux-edac
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the thermal throttle code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
index 3eec7de..e05dfa3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
if (!atomic_read(&therm_throt_en))
return 0;
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
@@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
#endif
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
return 0;
}
device_initcall(thermal_throttle_init_device);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 22/52] x86, amd, ibs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the amd-ibs code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
index 4b8e4d3..4c36bbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
@@ -926,13 +926,13 @@ static __init int amd_ibs_init(void)
goto out;
perf_ibs_pm_init();
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
ibs_caps = caps;
/* make ibs_caps visible to other cpus: */
smp_mb();
- perf_cpu_notifier(perf_ibs_cpu_notifier);
smp_call_function(setup_APIC_ibs, NULL, 1);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __perf_cpu_notifier(perf_ibs_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
ret = perf_event_ibs_init();
out:
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 23/52] x86, intel, cacheinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin,
tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the intel cacheinfo code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index 0641113..a952e9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -1225,21 +1225,24 @@ static struct notifier_block cacheinfo_cpu_notifier = {
static int __init cache_sysfs_init(void)
{
- int i;
+ int i, err = 0;
if (num_cache_leaves == 0)
return 0;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- int err;
struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(i);
err = cache_add_dev(dev);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&cacheinfo_cpu_notifier);
- return 0;
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&cacheinfo_cpu_notifier);
+
+out:
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+ return err;
}
device_initcall(cache_sysfs_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 21/52] x86, therm_throt.c: Remove unused therm_cpu_lock
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
H. Peter Anvin, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar,
linux-edac
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
After fixing the CPU hotplug callback registration code, the callbacks
invoked for each online CPU, during the initialization phase in
thermal_throttle_init_device(), can no longer race with the actual CPU
hotplug notifier callbacks (in thermal_throttle_cpu_callback). Hence the
therm_cpu_lock is unnecessary now. Remove it.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
index e05dfa3..d921b7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ static void thermal_throttle_remove_dev(struct device *dev)
sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &thermal_attr_group);
}
-/* Mutex protecting device creation against CPU hotplug: */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(therm_cpu_lock);
-
/* Get notified when a cpu comes on/off. Be hotplug friendly. */
static int
thermal_throttle_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
@@ -289,18 +286,14 @@ thermal_throttle_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
- mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
err = thermal_throttle_add_dev(dev, cpu);
- mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
WARN_ON(err);
break;
case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
- mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
thermal_throttle_remove_dev(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
break;
}
return notifier_from_errno(err);
@@ -321,17 +314,11 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
-#endif
/* connect live CPUs to sysfs */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
err = thermal_throttle_add_dev(get_cpu_device(cpu), cpu);
WARN_ON(err);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
-#endif
__register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the intel rapl code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
index 5ad35ad..059218e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -646,19 +646,20 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
/* unsupported */
return 0;
}
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
rapl_cpu_init(cpu);
}
- perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
+ __perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1);
if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return -1;
}
@@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval));
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 25/52] x86, amd, uncore: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the amd-uncore code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
index 754291a..3bbdf4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
@@ -531,15 +531,16 @@ static int __init amd_uncore_init(void)
if (ret)
return -ENODEV;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/* init cpus already online before registering for hotplug notifier */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
amd_uncore_cpu_up_prepare(cpu);
smp_call_function_single(cpu, init_cpu_already_online, NULL, 1);
}
- register_cpu_notifier(&amd_uncore_cpu_notifier_block);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&amd_uncore_cpu_notifier_block);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox