* [PATCH v3 14/52] powerpc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Olof Johansson,
linux-kernel, Wang Dongsheng, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, linuxppc-dev,
Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the sysfs code in powerpc by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Acked-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
index 97e1dc9..d90d4b7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -975,7 +975,8 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
int cpu;
register_nodes();
- register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu);
@@ -999,6 +1000,11 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
if (cpu_online(cpu))
register_cpu_online(cpu);
}
+
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&sysfs_cpu_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
sysfs_create_dscr_default();
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 15/52] x86, msr: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the msr code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/msr.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
index 05266b5..c9603ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
@@ -259,14 +259,15 @@ static int __init msr_init(void)
goto out_chrdev;
}
msr_class->devnode = msr_devnode;
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err = msr_device_create(i);
if (err != 0)
goto out_class;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
err = 0;
goto out;
@@ -275,7 +276,7 @@ out_class:
i = 0;
for_each_online_cpu(i)
msr_device_destroy(i);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
class_destroy(msr_class);
out_chrdev:
__unregister_chrdev(MSR_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/msr");
@@ -286,13 +287,14 @@ out:
static void __exit msr_exit(void)
{
int cpu = 0;
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
msr_device_destroy(cpu);
class_destroy(msr_class);
__unregister_chrdev(MSR_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/msr");
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
module_init(msr_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 16/52] x86, cpuid: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the cpuid code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
index 7d9481c..3225ae6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
@@ -198,14 +198,15 @@ static int __init cpuid_init(void)
goto out_chrdev;
}
cpuid_class->devnode = cpuid_devnode;
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err = cpuid_device_create(i);
if (err != 0)
goto out_class;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
err = 0;
goto out;
@@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ out_class:
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
cpuid_device_destroy(i);
}
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
class_destroy(cpuid_class);
out_chrdev:
__unregister_chrdev(CPUID_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/cpuid");
@@ -227,13 +228,13 @@ static void __exit cpuid_exit(void)
{
int cpu = 0;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
cpuid_device_destroy(cpu);
class_destroy(cpuid_class);
__unregister_chrdev(CPUID_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/cpuid");
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
module_init(cpuid_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 17/52] x86, vsyscall: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the vsyscall code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
index 1f96f93..556eaf2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -393,9 +393,13 @@ static int __init vsyscall_init(void)
{
BUG_ON(VSYSCALL_ADDR(0) != __fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_FIRST_PAGE));
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
on_each_cpu(cpu_vsyscall_init, NULL, 1);
/* notifier priority > KVM */
- hotcpu_notifier(cpu_vsyscall_notifier, 30);
+ __hotcpu_notifier(cpu_vsyscall_notifier, 30);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 18/52] x86, intel, uncore: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the uncore code in intel-x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index c88f7f4..e90183d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -3816,7 +3816,7 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
@@ -3835,9 +3835,9 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
}
on_each_cpu(uncore_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
- register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 19/52] x86, mce: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
H. Peter Anvin, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar,
linux-edac
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the mce code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 4d5419b..9b7734b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -2434,14 +2434,18 @@ static __init int mcheck_init_device(void)
if (err)
return err;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
err = mce_device_create(i);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return err;
+ }
}
register_syscore_ops(&mce_syscore_ops);
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&mce_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
/* register character device /dev/mcelog */
misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 20/52] x86, therm_throt.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
H. Peter Anvin, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar,
linux-edac
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the thermal throttle code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
index 3eec7de..e05dfa3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
if (!atomic_read(&therm_throt_en))
return 0;
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
@@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
#endif
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
return 0;
}
device_initcall(thermal_throttle_init_device);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 22/52] x86, amd, ibs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the amd-ibs code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
index 4b8e4d3..4c36bbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
@@ -926,13 +926,13 @@ static __init int amd_ibs_init(void)
goto out;
perf_ibs_pm_init();
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
ibs_caps = caps;
/* make ibs_caps visible to other cpus: */
smp_mb();
- perf_cpu_notifier(perf_ibs_cpu_notifier);
smp_call_function(setup_APIC_ibs, NULL, 1);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __perf_cpu_notifier(perf_ibs_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
ret = perf_event_ibs_init();
out:
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 23/52] x86, intel, cacheinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin,
tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the intel cacheinfo code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index 0641113..a952e9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -1225,21 +1225,24 @@ static struct notifier_block cacheinfo_cpu_notifier = {
static int __init cache_sysfs_init(void)
{
- int i;
+ int i, err = 0;
if (num_cache_leaves == 0)
return 0;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- int err;
struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(i);
err = cache_add_dev(dev);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&cacheinfo_cpu_notifier);
- return 0;
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&cacheinfo_cpu_notifier);
+
+out:
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+ return err;
}
device_initcall(cache_sysfs_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 21/52] x86, therm_throt.c: Remove unused therm_cpu_lock
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Tony Luck, Borislav Petkov, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
H. Peter Anvin, tj, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar,
linux-edac
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
After fixing the CPU hotplug callback registration code, the callbacks
invoked for each online CPU, during the initialization phase in
thermal_throttle_init_device(), can no longer race with the actual CPU
hotplug notifier callbacks (in thermal_throttle_cpu_callback). Hence the
therm_cpu_lock is unnecessary now. Remove it.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
index e05dfa3..d921b7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ static void thermal_throttle_remove_dev(struct device *dev)
sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &thermal_attr_group);
}
-/* Mutex protecting device creation against CPU hotplug: */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(therm_cpu_lock);
-
/* Get notified when a cpu comes on/off. Be hotplug friendly. */
static int
thermal_throttle_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
@@ -289,18 +286,14 @@ thermal_throttle_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
- mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
err = thermal_throttle_add_dev(dev, cpu);
- mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
WARN_ON(err);
break;
case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
- mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
thermal_throttle_remove_dev(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
break;
}
return notifier_from_errno(err);
@@ -321,17 +314,11 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
-#endif
/* connect live CPUs to sysfs */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
err = thermal_throttle_add_dev(get_cpu_device(cpu), cpu);
WARN_ON(err);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
-#endif
__register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the intel rapl code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
index 5ad35ad..059218e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -646,19 +646,20 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
/* unsupported */
return 0;
}
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
rapl_cpu_init(cpu);
}
- perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
+ __perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1);
if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return -1;
}
@@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval));
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 25/52] x86, amd, uncore: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
linux-pm, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
Paul Mackerras, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the amd-uncore code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
index 754291a..3bbdf4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_uncore.c
@@ -531,15 +531,16 @@ static int __init amd_uncore_init(void)
if (ret)
return -ENODEV;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/* init cpus already online before registering for hotplug notifier */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
amd_uncore_cpu_up_prepare(cpu);
smp_call_function_single(cpu, init_cpu_already_online, NULL, 1);
}
- register_cpu_notifier(&amd_uncore_cpu_notifier_block);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&amd_uncore_cpu_notifier_block);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 26/52] x86, hpet: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the hpet code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
index da85a8e..d89382b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -943,12 +943,14 @@ static __init int hpet_late_init(void)
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT))
return 0;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
hpet_cpuhp_notify(NULL, CPU_ONLINE, (void *)(long)cpu);
}
/* This notifier should be called after workqueue is ready */
- hotcpu_notifier(hpet_cpuhp_notify, -20);
+ __hotcpu_notifier(hpet_cpuhp_notify, -20);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 27/52] x86, pci, amd-bus: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, linux-pci, x86,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Bjorn Helgaas, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the amd-bus code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c b/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c
index a48be98..f05cbf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c
@@ -380,10 +380,13 @@ static int __init pci_io_ecs_init(void)
if (early_pci_allowed())
pci_enable_pci_io_ecs();
- register_cpu_notifier(&amd_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
amd_cpu_notify(&amd_cpu_notifier, (unsigned long)CPU_ONLINE,
(void *)(long)cpu);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&amd_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
pci_probe |= PCI_HAS_IO_ECS;
return 0;
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 28/52] x86, oprofile, nmi: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, x86, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Robert Richter, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the oprofile code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration. But retain the calls to get/put_online_cpus(), since they are
used in other places as well, to protect the variables 'nmi_enabled' and
'ctr_running'. Strictly speaking, this is not necessary since
cpu_notifier_register_begin/done() provide a stronger synchronization
with CPU hotplug than get/put_online_cpus(). However, let's retain the
calls to get/put_online_cpus() to be consistent with the other call-sites.
By nesting get/put_online_cpus() *inside* cpu_notifier_register_begin/done(),
we avoid the ABBA deadlock possibility mentioned above.
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
index 6890d84..379e8bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
@@ -494,14 +494,19 @@ static int nmi_setup(void)
if (err)
goto fail;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
+ /* Use get/put_online_cpus() to protect 'nmi_enabled' */
get_online_cpus();
- register_cpu_notifier(&oprofile_cpu_nb);
nmi_enabled = 1;
/* make nmi_enabled visible to the nmi handler: */
smp_mb();
on_each_cpu(nmi_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&oprofile_cpu_nb);
put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
return 0;
fail:
free_msrs();
@@ -512,12 +517,18 @@ static void nmi_shutdown(void)
{
struct op_msrs *msrs;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
+ /* Use get/put_online_cpus() to protect 'nmi_enabled' & 'ctr_running' */
get_online_cpus();
- unregister_cpu_notifier(&oprofile_cpu_nb);
on_each_cpu(nmi_cpu_shutdown, NULL, 1);
nmi_enabled = 0;
ctr_running = 0;
+ __unregister_cpu_notifier(&oprofile_cpu_nb);
put_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
/* make variables visible to the nmi handler: */
smp_mb();
unregister_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, "oprofile");
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 29/52] x86, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, kvm, linux-pm, Gleb Natapov, x86,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, H. Peter Anvin, tj,
Paolo Bonzini, Thomas Gleixner, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the kvm code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2b85784..4db6f56 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5365,7 +5365,8 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
int cpu;
max_tsc_khz = tsc_khz;
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&kvmclock_cpu_notifier_block);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
@@ -5382,6 +5383,10 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
smp_call_function_single(cpu, tsc_khz_changed, NULL, 1);
+
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&kvmclock_cpu_notifier_block);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, current_vcpu);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 30/52] arm64, hw_breakpoint.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Catalin Marinas,
Will Deacon, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Lorenzo Pieralisi,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the hw-breakpoint code in arm64 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index f17f581..bee7897 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
pr_info("found %d breakpoint and %d watchpoint registers.\n",
core_num_brps, core_num_wrps);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/*
* Reset the breakpoint resources. We assume that a halting
* debugger will leave the world in a nice state for us.
@@ -927,7 +929,10 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
TRAP_HWBKPT, "hw-watchpoint handler");
/* Register hotplug notifier. */
- register_cpu_notifier(&hw_breakpoint_reset_nb);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&hw_breakpoint_reset_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
/* Register cpu_suspend hw breakpoint restore hook */
cpu_suspend_set_dbg_restorer(hw_breakpoint_reset);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 31/52] arm64, debug-monitors: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Catalin Marinas,
Will Deacon, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
Russell King, paulmck, Ingo Molnar, linux-arm-kernel
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the debug-monitors code in arm64 by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index 636ba8b..c985531 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -155,12 +155,16 @@ static struct notifier_block os_lock_nb = {
static int debug_monitors_init(void)
{
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/* Clear the OS lock. */
smp_call_function(clear_os_lock, NULL, 1);
clear_os_lock(NULL);
/* Register hotplug handler. */
- register_cpu_notifier(&os_lock_nb);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&os_lock_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
}
postcore_initcall(debug_monitors_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 32/52] powercap, intel-rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Jacob Pan, Srivatsa S. Bhat,
Srinivas Pandruvada, tj, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the intel-rapl code in the powercap driver by using this latter form
of callback registration. But retain the calls to get/put_online_cpus(),
since they also protect the function rapl_cleanup_data(). By nesting
get/put_online_cpus() *inside* cpu_notifier_register_begin/done(), we avoid
the ABBA deadlock possibility mentioned above.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
index 3c67683..d6c74c1 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
@@ -1369,6 +1369,9 @@ static int __init rapl_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
}
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
/* prevent CPU hotplug during detection */
get_online_cpus();
ret = rapl_detect_topology();
@@ -1380,20 +1383,23 @@ static int __init rapl_init(void)
ret = -ENODEV;
goto done;
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&rapl_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&rapl_cpu_notifier);
done:
put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return ret;
}
static void __exit rapl_exit(void)
{
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
get_online_cpus();
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&rapl_cpu_notifier);
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&rapl_cpu_notifier);
rapl_unregister_powercap();
rapl_cleanup_data();
put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
module_init(rapl_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 33/52] scsi, bnx2i: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-scsi, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, James E.J. Bottomley, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Eddie Wai, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the bnx2i code in scsi by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@broadcom.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c
index 34c294b..80c03b4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c
@@ -537,11 +537,15 @@ static int __init bnx2i_mod_init(void)
p->iothread = NULL;
}
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
bnx2i_percpu_thread_create(cpu);
/* Initialize per CPU interrupt thread */
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2i_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2i_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;
@@ -581,11 +585,15 @@ static void __exit bnx2i_mod_exit(void)
}
mutex_unlock(&bnx2i_dev_lock);
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2i_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
bnx2i_percpu_thread_destroy(cpu);
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2i_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
iscsi_unregister_transport(&bnx2i_iscsi_transport);
cnic_unregister_driver(CNIC_ULP_ISCSI);
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 34/52] scsi, bnx2fc: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-scsi, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, James E.J. Bottomley, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Eddie Wai, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the bnx2fc code in scsi by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@broadcom.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
index 9b94850..c4ec235 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
@@ -2586,12 +2586,16 @@ static int __init bnx2fc_mod_init(void)
spin_lock_init(&p->fp_work_lock);
}
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
bnx2fc_percpu_thread_create(cpu);
}
/* Initialize per CPU interrupt thread */
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2fc_cpu_notifier);
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2fc_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
cnic_register_driver(CNIC_ULP_FCOE, &bnx2fc_cnic_cb);
@@ -2656,13 +2660,17 @@ static void __exit bnx2fc_mod_exit(void)
if (l2_thread)
kthread_stop(l2_thread);
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2fc_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
/* Destroy per cpu threads */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
bnx2fc_percpu_thread_destroy(cpu);
}
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&bnx2fc_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
destroy_workqueue(bnx2fc_wq);
/*
* detach from scsi transport
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 35/52] scsi, fcoe: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-scsi, Robert Love, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, James E.J. Bottomley, fcoe-devel, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the fcoe code in scsi by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: fcoe-devel@open-fcoe.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
index f317000..d5e105b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
@@ -2633,14 +2633,18 @@ static int __init fcoe_init(void)
skb_queue_head_init(&p->fcoe_rx_list);
}
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
fcoe_percpu_thread_create(cpu);
/* Initialize per CPU interrupt thread */
- rc = register_hotcpu_notifier(&fcoe_cpu_notifier);
+ rc = __register_hotcpu_notifier(&fcoe_cpu_notifier);
if (rc)
goto out_free;
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
/* Setup link change notification */
fcoe_dev_setup();
@@ -2655,6 +2659,9 @@ out_free:
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
fcoe_percpu_thread_destroy(cpu);
}
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
destroy_workqueue(fcoe_wq);
return rc;
@@ -2687,11 +2694,15 @@ static void __exit fcoe_exit(void)
}
rtnl_unlock();
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&fcoe_cpu_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
fcoe_percpu_thread_destroy(cpu);
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&fcoe_cpu_notifier);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
/*
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 36/52] zsmalloc: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Minchan Kim,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj,
paulmck, Ingo Molnar, Nitin Gupta
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the zsmalloc code by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/zsmalloc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index c03ca5e..36b4591 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -814,21 +814,32 @@ static void zs_exit(void)
{
int cpu;
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
zs_cpu_notifier(NULL, CPU_DEAD, (void *)(long)cpu);
- unregister_cpu_notifier(&zs_cpu_nb);
+ __unregister_cpu_notifier(&zs_cpu_nb);
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
static int zs_init(void)
{
int cpu, ret;
- register_cpu_notifier(&zs_cpu_nb);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&zs_cpu_nb);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
ret = zs_cpu_notifier(NULL, CPU_UP_PREPARE, (void *)(long)cpu);
- if (notifier_to_errno(ret))
+ if (notifier_to_errno(ret)) {
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
goto fail;
+ }
}
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+
return 0;
fail:
zs_exit();
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 37/52] acpi-cpufreq: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Viresh Kumar,
Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel, cpufreq, linuxppc-dev,
Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck, Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the acpi-cpufreq code by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 18448a7..245ae078e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -907,15 +907,16 @@ static void __init acpi_cpufreq_boost_init(void)
acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_supported = true;
acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled = boost_state(0);
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
/* Force all MSRs to the same value */
boost_set_msrs(acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled,
cpu_online_mask);
- register_cpu_notifier(&boost_nb);
+ __register_cpu_notifier(&boost_nb);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related
* [PATCH v3 38/52] drivers/base/topology.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2014-03-10 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulus, oleg, mingo, rjw, rusty, peterz, tglx, akpm
Cc: linux-arch, ego, walken, linux, linux-pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Srivatsa S. Bhat, tj, paulmck,
Ingo Molnar
In-Reply-To: <20140310203312.10746.310.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the topology code by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/base/topology.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
index 94ffee3..a738d10 100644
--- a/drivers/base/topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
@@ -161,16 +161,20 @@ static int topology_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
static int topology_sysfs_init(void)
{
int cpu;
- int rc;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
rc = topology_add_dev(cpu);
if (rc)
- return rc;
+ goto out;
}
- hotcpu_notifier(topology_cpu_callback, 0);
+ __hotcpu_notifier(topology_cpu_callback, 0);
- return 0;
+out:
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
+ return rc;
}
device_initcall(topology_sysfs_init);
^ permalink raw reply related
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox