linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexandros Kostopoulos" <akostop@inaccessnetworks.com>
To: "Scott Wood" <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: pci in arch/powerpc vs arch/ppc
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:42:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.twqn4vtsnhx3hy@phoenix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B88DAC.70005@freescale.com>

On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:20:12 +0300, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>=
  =

wrote:

> Alexandros Kostopoulos wrote:
>> Except from some macros arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h / mpc8260_pci9.=
h,  =

>> I  can seem to find anywhere the code regarding PCI Erratum 9. The  =

>> defined  macros(in io.h) for read/write are sufficient as a workaroun=
d  =

>> for PCI9?  Who does DMA and register initialization for this (it used=
  =

>> to be done in  arch/ppc/syslib/m8260_pci_erratum9.c in arc/ppc). Mayb=
e  =

>> u-boot or the  bootwrapper?
>
> I don't think the workaround exists yet in arch/powerpc, despite the  =

> config option.
>

Is there a plan to be implemented on arch/powerpc, or devices with the  =

erratum will have to keep on using the legacy arch/ppc code?

>> Another question regarding resource allocation: when   =

>> alloc_resource(pci_32.c), called from pcibios_allocate_resources(),  =

>> during  pcibios init, attempts to allocate resources using  =

>> request_resource(), the  request fails. This seems to happen because =
 =

>> the previously scanned PCI  devices request resources in the form, e.=
g.  =

>> 00000- 0000f (i.e. starting  from zero), and this should be mapped  =

>> somewhere else in cpu mem space. My  question (in order to find my bu=
g)  =

>> is, who performs this mapping, from PCI  space to CPU space, the kern=
el  =

>> (and if yes, where?) or the host bridge (in  which case, I've probabl=
y  =

>> failed to configure it properly).
>
> If the error message is the one I'm thinking of (it always helps to po=
st  =

> the actual messages), that's normal for when the PCI bus hasn't been  =

> probed by the firmware.  Linux first tries to use the BARs as they're =
 =

> already set, which will obviously fail because they haven't been set, =
 =

> and then it will properly allocated them.  It's harmless verbosity,  =

> though it'd be nice to have a flag to tell the PCI layer to not bother=
  =

> trying to preserve any existing BARs.
>

Well, the error message is:
PCI:0000:00:16.0: Resource 0: 0000000000000000-0000000000000fff (f=3D200=
)
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 0 of device 0000:00:16.0
PCI:  parent is c03c4058: 0000000080000000-00000000bfffffff (f=3D200)

The thing is, POBARs are already setup by uboot. However the resource  =

allocation for the PCI devices (not the host bridge) fails in  =

request_resource (which seems to use the region requested by the device =
as  =

is and not some mapped region in the cpu address space), and I can not  =

find where in the code happens the mapping from PCI to local bus mem  =

region. I mean, each PCI device requests some region, e.g. from 0000-00f=
f  =

and this is mapped to some region in the PCI outbound window, right. For=
  =

some reason this fails in my case, and I cannot find where in the code  =

this mapping should happen.

Thank you for your help

Alex

> -Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-08 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-03 14:58 pci in arch/powerpc vs arch/ppc Alexandros Kostopoulos
2007-08-03 20:10 ` Scott Wood
2007-08-04 16:39   ` Kumar Gala
2007-08-07  9:06     ` Alexandros Kostopoulos
2007-08-07 15:20       ` Scott Wood
2007-08-08 11:42         ` Alexandros Kostopoulos [this message]
2007-08-08 13:03           ` Alexandros Kostopoulos
2007-08-08 16:24             ` Scott Wood
2007-08-08 14:21           ` Alexandros Kostopoulos
2007-08-08 19:11             ` Scott Wood
2007-08-08 19:46               ` Alexandros Kostopoulos
2007-08-08 19:56                 ` Scott Wood
2007-08-08 22:20                   ` Alexandros Kostopoulos
2007-08-09 15:04                     ` Scott Wood
2007-08-09 15:56                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 23:28                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-10  4:32                 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-08 22:55             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-08 16:29           ` MPC8260 PCI9 erratum Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=op.twqn4vtsnhx3hy@phoenix \
    --to=akostop@inaccessnetworks.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).