From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arrakis.dune.hu (arrakis.dune.hu [78.24.191.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9B0FB7D13 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:03:56 +1100 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Josh Boyer" , "David Goodenough" Subject: Re: Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel? References: <201003161223.19238.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> <20100316143903.GK8963@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:58:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Imre Kaloz" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20100316143903.GK8963@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:39:03 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:23:19PM +0000, David Goodenough wrote: >> OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB >> (ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be > > ppc504? I've not heard of that one. Is that a typo for 405? Typo. >> merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2. >> >> If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the >> OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here? > > What exactly do you mean by "board description"? These are part of the patches I've told you about over IRC. The port uses the ppc40x_simple stuff with cuImage wrapper. It also has a CF connector, so that driver needs to be merged, too.. I'll submit everything when I'm a bit better.. Spent the last two weeks in bed :/ Imre