* Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel?
@ 2010-03-16 12:23 David Goodenough
2010-03-16 14:39 ` Josh Boyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Goodenough @ 2010-03-16 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB
(ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be
merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2.
If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the
OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel?
2010-03-16 12:23 Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel? David Goodenough
@ 2010-03-16 14:39 ` Josh Boyer
2010-03-16 21:58 ` Imre Kaloz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2010-03-16 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Goodenough; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:23:19PM +0000, David Goodenough wrote:
>OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB
>(ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be
ppc504? I've not heard of that one. Is that a typo for 405?
>merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2.
>
>If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the
>OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here?
What exactly do you mean by "board description"?
josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel?
2010-03-16 14:39 ` Josh Boyer
@ 2010-03-16 21:58 ` Imre Kaloz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Imre Kaloz @ 2010-03-16 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Boyer, David Goodenough; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:39:03 +0100, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:23:19PM +0000, David Goodenough wrote:
>> OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB
>> (ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be
>
> ppc504? I've not heard of that one. Is that a typo for 405?
Typo.
>> merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2.
>>
>> If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the
>> OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here?
>
> What exactly do you mean by "board description"?
These are part of the patches I've told you about over IRC. The port uses the
ppc40x_simple stuff with cuImage wrapper. It also has a CF connector, so
that driver needs to be merged, too..
I'll submit everything when I'm a bit better.. Spent the last two weeks in bed :/
Imre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel?
@ 2010-03-16 22:49 David Goodenough
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Goodenough @ 2010-03-16 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB
(ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be
merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2.
If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the
OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-16 22:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-16 12:23 Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel? David Goodenough
2010-03-16 14:39 ` Josh Boyer
2010-03-16 21:58 ` Imre Kaloz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-16 22:49 David Goodenough
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).