From: Jesper Skov <jskov@redhat.com>
To: Peter Allworth <linsol@zeta.org.au>
Cc: duncanp@research.canon.com.au,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Low memory problems in 8xx Linux
Date: 08 Feb 2000 11:01:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ot1z6of1ws.fsf@thinktwice.zoftcorp.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Peter Allworth's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:25:04 +1100"
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Allworth <linsol@zeta.org.au> writes:
Peter> duncanp@research.canon.com.au wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> On 1 Feb, Dan Malek wrote: > I have already incorporated most of
>> these into 2.3.xx > kernel, and a 2.2.13 version that I will update
>> as a tar file > on a server.
>>
>> would you mind posting a diff against the current 2.2.13 kernel on
>> the ftp server when you do this as well? we've got a kernel in CVS
>> here (i imagine plently of others are doing this too), and it would
>> be easier for us if we can patch it.
>>
>> Dunk.
Peter> Dunk,
Peter> If you need the MMU patches straight-away, I've put them on
Peter> http://www.zeta.org.au/~linsol
Peter> They only work against cllf-2.2.13 for now. Marcus Sundberg has
Peter> sent me a revised patch which should work for other 2.2 kernels
Peter> (caveat emptor). I'll try to add that asap.
Peter and Duncan,
The 2.2.13 patch you posted was slightly (but critically) wrong, if
I'm not mistaken. The value updated in memory was not reloaded into
r21 which is where the code below this snipped expects to find the
value.
This patch should do the trick. At least my kernel seems to work.
--- head.S.orig Sat Oct 23 00:18:03 1999
+++ head.S Tue Feb 8 10:34:02 2000
@@ -1024,6 +1024,18 @@
ori r21, r21, 1 /* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
+ lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
+ andi. r20, r20, _PAGE_PRESENT /* Set cr0 if it's invalid */
+ beq 4f /* Skip update if invalid */
+ mfspr r20, DSISR /* Check for store op */
+ andis. r20, r20, 0x0200 /* If set, indicates store */
+ lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte again */
+ beq 3f
+ ori r20, r20, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_HWWRITE /* Set the dirty flags */
+3:
+ ori r20, r20, _PAGE_ACCESSED /* Set the accessed flag */
+ stw r20, 0(r21) /* Update the pte */
+4:
lwz r21, 0(r21) /* Get the pte */
/* Set four subpage valid bits (24, 25, 26, and 27).
An alternative and slighly faster implementation might be to skip the
_PAGE_PRESENT check. Any reason something like this wouldn't work?
ori r21, r21, 1 /* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
mtspr MD_TWC, r21 /* Load pte table base address */
mfspr r21, MD_TWC /* ....and get the pte address */
mfspr r20, DSISR /* Check for store op */
andis. r20, r20, 0x0200 /* If set, indicates store */
lwz r20, 0(r21) /* Get the pte again */
beq 3f
ori r20, r20, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_HWWRITE /* Set the dirty flags */
3:
ori r20, r20, _PAGE_ACCESSED /* Set the accessed flag */
stw r20, 0(r21) /* Update the pte */
mr r21, r20 /* Get the pte */
Cheers,
Jesper
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-08 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-31 15:02 Low memory problems in 8xx Linux Marcus Sundberg
2000-02-01 2:51 ` Peter Allworth
2000-02-01 18:08 ` Marcus Sundberg
2000-02-01 19:47 ` Dan Malek
2000-02-01 23:30 ` Peter Allworth
2000-02-01 23:59 ` Dan Malek
2000-02-01 23:54 ` duncanp
2000-02-02 0:25 ` Peter Allworth
2000-02-08 10:01 ` Jesper Skov [this message]
2000-02-09 0:00 ` Peter Allworth
2000-02-09 8:43 ` Jesper Skov
2000-02-09 23:26 ` Peter Allworth
2000-02-09 1:11 ` more " Peter Allworth
2000-02-09 5:52 ` Dan Malek
2000-02-09 8:40 ` Jesper Skov
2000-03-22 15:43 ` Residual data Claude Robitaille
2000-03-23 10:36 ` Gabriel Paubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ot1z6of1ws.fsf@thinktwice.zoftcorp.dk \
--to=jskov@redhat.com \
--cc=duncanp@research.canon.com.au \
--cc=linsol@zeta.org.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).