From: Scott Hankin <shankin@rational.com>
To: paulus@linuxcare.com.au
Cc: phandel@cise.ufl.edu, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test10 boot failure on Powerbook G3
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:46:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p04320401b615fad098d5@[172.21.170.210]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14831.41519.899373.33270@argo.linuxcare.com.au>
At 12:38 PM +1100 10/20/00, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>Scott Hankin writes:
>
>> It turned out that the pc was in do_install_cmap, and lr was in
>> atyfb_set_var. The latter calls the former near the end of the
>> routine (check out drivers/video/atyfb.c:2940) but as to why it's
>> bombing, I have no clue.
>
>Looking at the code for that routine:
>
>static void do_install_cmap(int con, struct fb_info *fb)
>{
> struct fb_info_aty *info = (struct fb_info_aty*)info;
>
>that first statement doesn't make sense, change it to:
>
> struct fb_info_aty *info = (struct fb_info_aty*) fb;
>
>and that should fix it.
>
>BTW, I now have copies of my rsync trees at penguinppc.org, which will
>hopefully have more bandwidth available than ppc.samba.org did. The
>tree at penguinppc.org::linux-pmac-devel has this bug fixed.
Thanks, Paul, Ben and Peter for the friendly responses.
Yes, that line does look a little odd. I did finally get things
working by using the BitKeeper archives for my build (the penguinppc
site is currently unavailable) and it came up fine.
Is there an easy way to compare the current source tree with the
previous version? Is there a way to get the previous version and
brute force it? I got in this mess partly because using rsync means
you can't go back. Had I been able to go back to test9 easily, I
would have, and waited for the fix. But as it was, I ended up going
back to 2.2.17, largely because it was available.
There was a silver lining to all this: my current setup now boots and
runs cleaning with both 2.2.17 final and 2.4.0-test10 with devfs
mounted at boot.
Forgive what must surely seem like trivial problems; I am only slowly
becoming informed about kernel organization and distribution. Many
thanks to all.
- Scott
-----------------------------
Scott Hankin (shankin@rational.com) In the beginning, there was nothing, then
Rational Software God said, "Let there be light." And there
20 Maguire Road was light. There was still nothing, but
Lexington, MA 02421 you could see it a lot better.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-20 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-19 17:13 2.4.0-test10 boot failure on Powerbook G3 Scott Hankin
2000-10-19 17:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-10-19 17:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-10-19 20:06 ` phandel
2000-10-19 20:51 ` Scott Hankin
2000-10-20 1:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-10-20 13:46 ` Scott Hankin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='p04320401b615fad098d5@[172.21.170.210]' \
--to=shankin@rational.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=paulus@linuxcare.com.au \
--cc=phandel@cise.ufl.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox