From: Stefan Jeglinski <jeglin@4pi.com>
To: Hollis R Blanchard <hollis+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: aic7xxx panic in 2.2.18pre21
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:33:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p04330100b63ca26f7c74@[192.168.0.1]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96L.1001118150530.15284H-100000@MOTRIN.WEH.ANDREW.CMU.EDU>
> > C000F508:
>> c000f4f4 T ioremap
>> c000f518 T __ioremap
>>
>> C013CAC8:
>> c013b454 t aic7xxx_load_seeprom
>> c013c444 T aic7xxx_detect
> > c013d9f8 t aic7xxx_allocate_negotiation_command
<snip>
>The backtrace is in reverse order; the topmost item is the most recent
>function called. So ioremap is crashing near the end, after being called
>by aic7xxx_detect.
And indeed, I just compiled a kernel without the aic7xxx driver. It
breezed right through the previous panic point and found the mesh
(internal) and external scsi busses, but of course could not mount
the root partition.
>And yes, you can find aic7xxx_detect() in the
>sources, probably in linux/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx.c
I'm off to find ioremap.c. What's the difference between ioremap and
__ioremap? Should I add kernel messages in ioremap.c to find out
exactly where the crash occurs? I assume if I diff the old (2.2.17)
versus new (2.2.18pre21) ioremap.c, the culprit will jump out pretty
quick? Or might the error be more subtle than that? Does anyone know
if ioremap.c has been the subject of a lot of changes recently? I
doubt seriously I can just take the old ioremap and use it in place
of the new...
Thanks Hollis. I feel a bit less helpless now...
Stefan Jeglinski
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-18 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-03 5:53 whacked out 2.2.18pre17? Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-03 15:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-11-04 6:03 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-04 12:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-11-04 15:55 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-05 9:36 ` Michel Lanners
2000-11-05 22:59 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-06 7:12 ` Michel Lanners
2000-11-18 3:12 ` whacked out 2.2.18pre21? Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-18 20:03 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-18 20:09 ` aic7xxx panic in 2.2.18pre21 Hollis R Blanchard
2000-11-18 21:33 ` Stefan Jeglinski [this message]
2000-11-10 6:58 ` whacked out 2.2.18pre17? [partly solved] Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-03 23:52 ` whacked out 2.2.18pre17? Tony Mantler
2000-11-04 1:15 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2000-11-04 2:01 ` Tony Mantler
2000-11-04 12:35 ` Simon Piette
2000-11-04 15:32 ` Tony Mantler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='p04330100b63ca26f7c74@[192.168.0.1]' \
--to=jeglin@4pi.com \
--cc=hollis+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).