* linuxppc_2_5 == 2.4.17? @ 2001-12-27 16:06 Stefan Jeglinski 2001-12-28 15:35 ` Tom Rini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Stefan Jeglinski @ 2001-12-27 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev I may be missing the obvious, because it's been a looong time since I played with a development version, but... I rsynced the linuxppc_2_5 tree from mvista, and although the config settings are obviously different and with new items, it is set to build as 2.4.17 (as per the Makefile and version.h), just like linuxppc_2_4. Shouldn't it instead be 2.5.1 or 2.5.2pre2 or something? Stefan Jeglinski ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linuxppc_2_5 == 2.4.17? 2001-12-27 16:06 linuxppc_2_5 == 2.4.17? Stefan Jeglinski @ 2001-12-28 15:35 ` Tom Rini [not found] ` <p04330100b85243b7a911@[66.57.250.32]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2001-12-28 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Jeglinski; +Cc: linuxppc-dev On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Stefan Jeglinski wrote: > I rsynced the linuxppc_2_5 tree from mvista, and although the config > settings are obviously different and with new items, it is set to > build as 2.4.17 (as per the Makefile and version.h), just like > linuxppc_2_4. Shouldn't it instead be 2.5.1 or 2.5.2pre2 or something? Er, I just checked and both the Bitkeeper and rsync mirrors are at 2.5.2-pre2 right now. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <p04330100b85243b7a911@[66.57.250.32]>]
[parent not found: <20011228155810.GN712@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net>]
* Re: linuxppc_2_5 == 2.4.17? [not found] ` <20011228155810.GN712@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> @ 2001-12-28 18:28 ` Stefan Jeglinski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Stefan Jeglinski @ 2001-12-28 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Rini; +Cc: linuxppc-dev >Ah ha! The problem was the linuxppc_2_5 line in the rsyncd.conf was >pointing at 2_4_devel. Fixed now. Thanks much! Stefan ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-28 18:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-27 16:06 linuxppc_2_5 == 2.4.17? Stefan Jeglinski
2001-12-28 15:35 ` Tom Rini
[not found] ` <p04330100b85243b7a911@[66.57.250.32]>
[not found] ` <20011228155810.GN712@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net>
2001-12-28 18:28 ` Stefan Jeglinski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).