From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.suse.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C8867BA9 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:31:52 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Linux v2.6.18-rc4, snd-aoa link error In-Reply-To: <44D9D532.9010200@sipsolutions.net> References: <20060808194651.GA29482@aepfle.de> <1155067429.26338.96.camel@mindpipe> <44D9B1BE.9070600@sipsolutions.net> <44D9C8E5.10109@sipsolutions.net> <44D9D532.9010200@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Lee Revell , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , At Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:29:38 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > >> Yeah, I really should know :) But I'm not sure at the moment, and the > >> powermac I own is a few hundred kilometers away... > >> > > > > Don't worry, we can wait :) > > > Maybe someone on linuxppc-dev can quickly check? Does a G5 use > I2C_POWERMAC for access to the codecs? I think it does, but there are > other I2C busses as well. > >> That looks good to me, and should get rid of the build failure. However, > >> if one doesn't configure I2C_POWERMAC, no codec will ever be found at > >> runtime. > >> > > > > Yes, that's my concern, too. > > > I'm not sure how much we should force the users to a sensible > configuration ;) But I suppose selecting I2C_POWERMAC is fine for all > relevant machines for now. Agreed. A relevant question: do we need I2C_POWERMAC for both onyx and tas? Takashi