From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tchaikovsky.artsenscene.org (crazy.xmat.net [91.121.11.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE7ADDDF0 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:37:08 +1100 (EST) To: jonsmirl@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9e4733910712270847j35778e43i66fda3eca9dc125@mail.gmail.com> From: "Jean Delvare" Errors-To: "Jean Delvare" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: World Wide Web Owner Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:14:28 +0100 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi John, Le 27/12/2007, Jon Smirl =E9crit: >On 12/19/07, Jon Smirl wrote: >> Another rework of the i2c for powerpc device tree patch. This version impl= ements standard alias naming only on the powerpc platform and only for the de= vice tree names. The old naming mechanism of i2c_client.name,driver_name is l= eft in place and not changed for non-powerpc platforms. This patch is fully c= apable of dynamically loading the i2c modules. You can modprobe in the i2c-mp= c driver and the i2c modules described in the device tree will be automatical= ly loaded. Modules also work if compiled in. > >Are there any further objections to this patch? Can it all go in >through the powerpc trees or do the i2c people want to send it on? I am on vacation until January 4th. I will review your patchset the week following my return. Thanks for your patience, -- Jean Delvare