linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Mantler <eek@escape.ca>
To: "David A. Gatwood" <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>,
	John L Grantham <jgrantha@hannover.sgh-net.de>
Cc: Info <info@amberjack.net>,
	linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: LinuxPPC vs. RedHat???
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:33:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <v04003a00b4e344920669@[216.81.6.109]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000301112749.15584D-100000@deepspace.mklinux.org>


At 1:28 PM -0600 3/1/2000, David A. Gatwood wrote:
>On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, John L Grantham wrote:
>
[...]
>> <nitpick>Not Debian...</nitpick>
>
>Is the Debian distribution a working distribution now?  I'd gotten the
>impression that it was still a work-in-progress.

A little while back I went about the proscess of converting my friend's
7600 and PBG3 to Linux. He chose LinuxPPC for the 7600, and I went for
Debian on his PBG3, since I had worked with it a lot in my 68k and
subsequent x86 dealings.

This was before Debian's installer had PowerMac support (which may still be
the case, I haven't checked), so installing the system manually was a bit
entertaining to say the least.

However, after all that was dealt with and the system was installed, it
proved to be (imho) a much better system than his LinuxPPC desktop system.
I never had to search for rpms, every package came with very sane, useable
default configuration files, and pretty much every package I've installed
on that box has worked first try, without any fussing or messing about.

No offense to the LinuxPPC guys here, :) but the difference has been enough
to convince him to get me to install Debian to replace LinuxPPC on his 7600
too.


Cheers - Tony :)


--
Tony Mantler         Renaissance Nerd Extraordinaire         eek@escape.ca
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada                       http://www.escape.ca/~eek


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-03-01 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-01 17:31 LinuxPPC vs. RedHat??? John L Grantham
2000-03-01 19:28 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-03-01 22:33   ` Tony Mantler [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-01 19:31 John L Grantham
2000-03-01 19:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-01 20:07 ` Renaud Dreyer
2000-03-01 15:12 Info
2000-03-01 16:11 ` Rich West
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000301091552.2277C-100000@deepspace.mklinux.org>
2000-03-01 18:24   ` Matt Porter
2000-03-01 20:28   ` Bill Brooks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='v04003a00b4e344920669@[216.81.6.109]' \
    --to=eek@escape.ca \
    --cc=dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org \
    --cc=info@amberjack.net \
    --cc=jgrantha@hannover.sgh-net.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).