From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010106104247.A1400@opus.bloom.county> References: <20010106055922.Y29805@plato.local.lan>; from erbenson@alaska.net on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:59:22AM -0900 <200101051455.f05Et0v06700@ashley.ivey.uwo.ca> <20010105083740.B14321@opus.bloom.county> <20010105154015.R29805@plato.local.lan> <3A572925.4A791E05@iiic.ethz.ch> <20010106055922.Y29805@plato.local.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 12:22:19 -0600 To: Tom Rini , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org From: Tony Mantler Subject: Re: status of ppc support in official 2.4.0 or Alan's 2.4.0-ac1 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: At 11:42 AM -0600 1/6/2001, Tom Rini wrote: [...] >In short, what I think we'll need soon is what 2.4.0 needs now. People other >than the usual gang of testers to try it out and find bugs. For the record, where is an rsync/tgz for the current 'needs testing' tree? I haven't had a bootable kernel on my 9600/200mp since 2.4.0-test11 linux-pmac-devel rsync. Cheers - Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler :) -- Tony "Nicoya" Mantler - Renaissance Nerd Extraordinaire - nicoya@apia.dhs.org Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada -- http://nicoya.feline.pp.se/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/