From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <39831703.185AB483@embeddededge.com> References: <39821DD7.ED0DA0A2@embeddededge.com>; from dan@netx4.com on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 07:57:11PM -0400 <39821DD7.ED0DA0A2@embeddededge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:56:40 -0500 To: Dan Malek From: Tony Mantler Subject: Re: CONFIG_PPC != Mac Cc: Tom Rini , linuxppc-dev Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: At 12:40 PM -0500 7/29/2000, Dan Malek wrote: >Tony Mantler wrote: > >> Add a CONFIG_PMAC maybe? I don't really object to sharing CONFIG_MAC with >> PPC, except that it would be easy to assume that CONFIG_MAC == CONFIG_MAC >> && __powerpc__, and vice versa CONFIG_MAC == CONFIG_MAC && __m68k__. > >Ahhhhh....I get it. Apologies to the m68k folks.... >OK....let me think about this and work on some alternatives. So, it >is OK to assume CONFIG_MAC implies m68k? At the moment, it appears yes. via-cuda.c is a good example of this. On the other hand, valkyriefb.c uses __mc68000 instead, so go fig. Cheers - Tony :) -- Tony Mantler Renaissance Nerd Extraordinaire nicoya@apia.dhs.org Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada http://nicoya.feline.pp.se/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/