linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcus Sundberg <marcus@cendio.se>
To: Dan Malek <dan@netx4.com>
Cc: Seungdong Lee <sdlee@da-san.com>, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 8240 BogoMIPS
Date: 20 May 2000 22:14:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vehfbtasi8.fsf@lipta.cendio.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Dan Malek's message of "Sat, 20 May 2000 13:36:21 -0400"


Dan Malek <dan@netx4.com> writes:

> Seungdong Lee wrote:
> > BogoMIPS value of my board is currently 131.89.
> > My board is configured to run in 200MHz system clock.
>
> I have not booted my 8240 for a while, and I don't remember the number.
> I have another 8240 showing up soon, so I will be back on that before
> long and will pay attention to this.  For some reason, I do remember that
> with caches disabled this number is _really_ small, like 13 or 18 or
> something.

I'm not very familiar with 82x0 processors, but doesn't 8240 use a
603-core? When I worked with a 603ev running at 200 MHz I got
something like 133 BogoMIPS, so then the above value would be correct.

> I wouldn't use BogoMIPS for any kind of benchmark.  There have been
> plenty of discussions on mailing lists (including linuxppc lists) to
> indicate this abosolute number doesn't mean much.  I have many PowerPC
> systems running Linux, from 8xx embedded though 7400/G4 systems.  I
> certainly can't predict what this number "should" be.

The BogoMIPS can be used for rough sanity-checks when comparing
processors with identical cores and different clocks. For anything
else it's completely useless. And excelent example is that a
Pentium CPU gives a BogoMIPS value of about 1xclock, while a Pentium
MMX CPU gives about 2xclock, even though their real-life performance
is practicly the same.

//Marcus
--
-------------------------------+-----------------------------------
        Marcus Sundberg        |       Phone: +46 707 452062
  Embedded Systems Consultant  |      Email: marcus@cendio.se
       Cendio Systems AB       |       http://www.cendio.com

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-05-20 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-05-20  7:28 8240 BogoMIPS Seungdong Lee
2000-05-20 17:36 ` Dan Malek
2000-05-20 20:14   ` Marcus Sundberg [this message]
2000-05-22  2:38     ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-22  9:34       ` Marcus Sundberg
2000-05-22  9:54         ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-22 10:50           ` Geir Frode Raanes
2000-05-22 11:19             ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-26  7:45         ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-22  2:29   ` Seungdong Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vehfbtasi8.fsf@lipta.cendio.se \
    --to=marcus@cendio.se \
    --cc=dan@netx4.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=sdlee@da-san.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).