linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com>
To: James Goodwin <jamesg@Filanet.com>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: SBP-2 on PPC
Date: 26 Feb 2001 23:48:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7k86cviik.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> (raw)


More investigation shows that even thought we get a status writeback
saying we the request went okay, and no errors at all, it never
actually wrote the login response where we told it.

I memset'd the login response to all ff's, rather than all 0's, and
sure 'nuf, it was still all ff's afterwards.

Of course, then our command block orb has an address that's wrong,which  is invariably the reason the scsi commands timeout.

At first I thought it was probably a bug in my ohci fixes, but looking
back a few weeks, someone experienced this exact problem using the
pcilynx driver on a PPC.

So it's not likely to be my fault.

I tried every combination of byte swapping I can think of, with no
success. I tried fiddling with the flags we pass to allocate memory,
etc. you name the stupid little variable, i tried it.

The orb offset in the status block we get when it writes back the
status is correct for the login orb we sent.

Why would it be able to write *that* in our host memory, but not be
able to write something else in our host memory?

I've copied it to the PPC development list, in case somebody knows
something I don't.

--Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

                 reply	other threads:[~2001-02-27  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x7k86cviik.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu \
    --to=dberlin@redhat.com \
    --cc=jamesg@Filanet.com \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).