From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B33CDDDF9 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:11:04 +1100 (EST) To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc ptrace block-step References: <20090401215903.DE872FC3AB@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1238650016.17330.193.camel@pasglop> <20090403004450.F2166FC3AB@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090403011327.GA16881@zod.rchland.ibm.com> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:10:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090403011327.GA16881@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (Josh Boyer's message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:13:27 -0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Roland McGrath , utrace-devel@redhat.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer writes: > [...] While I would love to believe that systemtap should work > everywhere, I can't really see it running on an embedded board at > this point. FWIW, we have had people running (not compiling) systemtap probe modules on embedded systems. See "stap -p4" or "stap-server". - FChE