From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388BBC43458 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 05:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gznK32QKKz2xRs; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:04:07 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1784005447; cv=none; b=MrRW4Rq6ACEYKrzXzDx1DLYZ3wnmaPMOLnmwvlF5U5nk4uaTEenHltb1f0XpGSeVnukuV7Ye3KwOBMASMJbEdcYoG8KcKwHpjNpaKq8Yueor2PolGAyZ5hpFRKz3zKyV4XI7T/0dR1e9sXdIFgb8MbSKSZUoNSg8wuxciF9kBw7x7olk4SfZjKR9DSwxHiNg5yd7A6iUB+oLixCwUBs0cL6xOTAd9wAcLGpc2T58Yb0uckgYOrBBJcueqHd3rH0qIm69dXjhLjOBVtl7ATrxZevWvmI96Kuq14iPh6cnJEJ9kkBm6DjiuFXWXzyyoBoLAhU+s33qqH0A5G6pUmvTXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1784005447; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=GWX7BHocDQy79xg1nWh2GEbrLAdwjBZsgjhN9hnUanY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i9CNK3ywgadsgMOwb8SO87AK/G+A8nRnV8MkEPVCMsIhbiNwHOyI8oxjJRShA0wqVfV/vDOZyNMj/ykk+wY0wlLGjEl0VmEZo16BttwhOGadVSzTubskeAG22TbnXNkNc1egqNrRJnbEfUpHwQVRXidZCnw7dNrEz7j31b6v6KunTZBkAx7PFQLmUEt+e8dfYiqlIZqe5+Wdr55GS84IWi6+UBsRjr/rcogy5Ebo3lTkxJpMvadkc8P7g7p1PUiJNeAdN0YsbB7NnqL90TsAct4fDVV+4wwVMVGo7uxKCqm2poAvwG1t0Ry5fXZPcQim0FdeBnzADA0t/HbMn5otKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=CKlMkUeo; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25; helo=sea.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=CKlMkUeo; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25; helo=sea.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gznK20p2wz2xKh for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:04:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C7A41851; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 05:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78B5E1F000E9; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 05:03:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784005442; bh=GWX7BHocDQy79xg1nWh2GEbrLAdwjBZsgjhN9hnUanY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=CKlMkUeoK3O/MtOhbbbjwFwTm02ZhG1JN0IrLP/cep1imp4Q1D4dC+CryFlGQdYf0 p9WAKGQzC5wBQM5okRin6feO0hARpilwewRhbaiNNcCKM1j8Jc7MocDpN5cw2tKRK8 nj+1LYvvaTzSiKhPl4FiIFz0yQWKY4HCBfMNmOWwUa9RX0yKX9PkcYdXM49sULT1/h UYL/h7YPtNp3dRvfiutw7m+FoTgPWe+acBb+18F1Q4lrBV7r68ZIbrLJjQvU18da7D JyZBOTNljbEhD6ihH8+PmlV84vY3FW+tDDZSgTIf8Zax7ZuCxIIFsxyvwgxavAix6i 2U6+oR3PBWaIQ== X-Mailer: emacs 30.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Aneesh Kumar K.V To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, Robin Murphy , Marek Szyprowski , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Catalin Marinas , Jiri Pirko , Mostafa Saleh , Petr Tesarik , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Dan Williams , Xu Yilun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Alexander Gordeev , Gerald Schaefer , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , x86@kernel.org, Michael Kelley Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 20/22] dma: swiotlb: free dynamic pools from process context In-Reply-To: <20260713194131.GZ3133966@ziepe.ca> References: <20260701054926.825925-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> <20260701054926.825925-21-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> <20260713194131.GZ3133966@ziepe.ca> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:33:49 +0530 Message-ID: X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jason Gunthorpe writes: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 11:19:24AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: > >> @@ -840,7 +843,7 @@ static void swiotlb_del_pool(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool) >> list_del_rcu(&pool->node); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->dma_io_tlb_lock, flags); >> >> - call_rcu(&pool->rcu, swiotlb_dyn_free); >> + swiotlb_schedule_dyn_free(pool); > > This knows if the pool has cc_shared memory in it since there is now a > flag tracking that? So should the work queue version be conditional on > that flag? > We could definitely do that. I was not sure whether it was worth it, considering that it would add two paths for SWIOTLB dynamic free. -aneesh