From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="idNnUYi6" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6193ED7F for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:48:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701269291; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MFzqrh0xCRuB2+k7XQGRqfBWGZI6cFLK12C66Jum2dE=; b=idNnUYi6G4FXVwbQiLDkt9dSajm2Oa8kNOeYcEuEJGlmTNUAhJm8M6rwpBBOM/0+aNT9Nz jA9I55xBOLOH1Wwhgw4rDSAgZAwqCByT4U2KRPaCPDUQRB1vvhU/gf2YQ59XTIdmkDfU31 0ikHOQoOyCu46DiHtA6E+X0jkmz9dkU= Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-435-6EMdrYt2OOq7KAo6hwyS0A-1; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:48:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 6EMdrYt2OOq7KAo6hwyS0A-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67a3214af23so45836466d6.1 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:48:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701269289; x=1701874089; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MFzqrh0xCRuB2+k7XQGRqfBWGZI6cFLK12C66Jum2dE=; b=k1qf96V41qDb4myGQ35dbm4kLL2+5+0laSCQ8wYq1pC4s2c+FBF8cQF7Ymh3htDZ81 y6Rv0i+0yTwgdAiOKz2BHSOWXUvJUZIB2IXp377X/tZ8LV+Dr5UOvW1fz4k3CQQiINxP kQidT7tlzaSlNQrzBTDkSPysyPnOsk4IPZyF4ZmnIp3Kyt+CqSEqg0+66dbi6SM42tT3 lJDzvrrgqArEgVjCUAh8xqWJ1QXlPjTZWZGawWlam4FmcAt5ObsQ+3319JayL3nvyl0I HPpQHENTMFmND2cL590Amtznr6Wc4Xm54RcalU7e4/sBV2TtCyc0HIUqQacWZf0ZZFPQ BaiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSVuSWReK0l8Gcpm71w874VaI618nnZiFBaBwU5aP9RbAyUawD UexJWBibIlgIud6T8y5jcSXfh3DR6UlKUXCpAprSTHauzcmmw6AoEBU2GDAqCm9d67mRyV+gK3F 2jwXp+nUUqP9NhPfQAz9CnnSd1A== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4690:0:b0:66d:3716:4e14 with SMTP id pl16-20020ad44690000000b0066d37164e14mr13906370qvb.4.1701269289423; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:48:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGR1J+F2tJR6UUsOb1ujw2zvaJBctB34SjfXwongFIrxqaUpUhB2SgOTZ7ODXSst5RgCPwkog== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4690:0:b0:66d:3716:4e14 with SMTP id pl16-20020ad44690000000b0066d37164e14mr13906356qvb.4.1701269289190; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:48:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-68-160-135-240.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [68.160.135.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ea14-20020ad458ae000000b0067a33b921cdsm4059978qvb.42.2023.11.29.06.48.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:48:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1f66c647-e51b-4640-cbff-67b17e2077ad@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:48:07 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Miroslav Benes Cc: Matthew Wilcox , attreyee-muk , jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap References: <20231127155758.33070-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com> <202dbdf5-1adf-4ffa-a50d-0424967286ba@infradead.org> <0e7941d8-d9b2-4253-9ad5-0f7806e45e2e@infradead.org> From: Joe Lawrence Subject: Re: [PATCH] Took care of some grammatical mistakes In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/29/23 05:08, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > I am not a native speaker, but "step on each other's toe" sounds the best > to me. Or perhaps even "they need to be aware of each other and not step > on their toes" since it is then kind of implied? English is difficult :). > Native speaker here, so don't ask me what's grammatically accurate :D I would definitely say "step on" vs. "step over". I would also write "each other's toes", but not flinch if I read "each others' toes" or even "each others toes". After thinking about it for more that 30s, I might consider rewording the sentence to avoid the idiom altogether, something like: "Therefore they need to coordinate to avoid interfering with each other." -- Joe