From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, hpa@zytor.com,
luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke()
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:14:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021141419.GB21112@linux-8ccs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018134058.7zyls4746wpa7jy5@pathway.suse.cz>
+++ Petr Mladek [18/10/19 15:40 +0200]:
>On Fri 2019-10-18 15:03:42, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> +++ Miroslav Benes [16/10/19 15:29 +0200]:
>> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>> > Thinking about it more... crazy idea. I think we could leverage these new
>> > ELF .text per vmlinux/module sections for the reinvention I was talking
>> > about. If we teach module loader to relocate (and apply alternatives and
>> > so on, everything in arch-specific module_finalize()) not the whole module
>> > in case of live patch modules, but separate ELF .text sections, it could
>> > solve the issue with late module patching we have. It is a variation on
>> > Steven's idea. When live patch module is loaded, only its section for
>> > present modules would be processed. Then whenever a to-be-patched module
>> > is loaded, its .text section in all present patch module would be
>> > processed.
>> >
>> > The upside is that almost no work would be required on patch modules
>> > creation side. The downside is that klp_modinfo must stay. Module loader
>> > needs to be hacked a lot in both cases. So it remains to be seen which
>> > idea is easier to implement.
>> >
>> > Jessica, do you think it would be feasible?
>>
>> I think that does sound feasible. I'm trying to visualize how that
>> would look. I guess there would need to be various livepatching hooks
>> called during the different stages (apply_relocate_add(),
>> module_finalize(), module_enable_ro/x()).
>>
>> So maybe something like the following?
>>
>> When a livepatch module loads:
>> apply_relocate_add()
>> klp hook: apply .klp.rela.$objname relocations *only* for
>> already loaded modules
>> module_finalize()
>> klp hook: apply .klp.arch.$objname changes for already loaded modules
>> module_enable_ro()
>> klp hook: only enable ro/x for .klp.text.$objname for already
>> loaded modules
>
>Just for record. We should also set ro for the not-yet used
>.klp.text.$objname at this stage so that it can't be modified
>easily "by accident".
If we also set ro protection already for .klp.text.$objname for
not-yet loaded modules, I think this would unfortunately mean we would
still have to do the protection flipping for late module patching that
Peter was trying to avoid, right?
That is, we *still* end up having to do the whole module_disable_ro()
-> apply_relocate_add() -> module_finalize() -> module_enable_ro()
thing for late module patching, except now we've moved that work to
the module loader instead of in klp_module_coming.. It sounds just as
complicated as the current way :/
However, I think this complaint would not apply if livepatch switches
to the one patch module per module model..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191007081945.10951536.8@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20191008104335.6fcd78c9@gandalf.local.home>
[not found] ` <20191009224135.2dcf7767@oasis.local.home>
[not found] ` <20191010092054.GR2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[not found] ` <20191010091956.48fbcf42@gandalf.local.home>
[not found] ` <20191010140513.GT2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[not found] ` <20191010115449.22044b53@gandalf.local.home>
[not found] ` <20191010172819.GS2328@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[not found] ` <20191011125903.GN2359@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[not found] ` <20191015130739.GA23565@linux-8ccs>
[not found] ` <20191015135634.GK2328@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2019-10-15 14:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke() Miroslav Benes
2019-10-15 15:06 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-10-15 15:31 ` Jessica Yu
2019-10-15 22:17 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-10-15 22:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-16 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-16 10:15 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-10-21 15:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-20 16:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-21 8:35 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-21 16:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-22 10:09 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-22 21:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-28 9:28 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-28 15:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-28 15:40 ` Petr Mladek
2020-01-28 17:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-29 0:46 ` Jiri Kosina
2020-01-29 2:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-29 3:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2020-01-29 12:28 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-29 15:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-30 9:53 ` Petr Mladek
2020-01-30 14:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-31 7:17 ` Petr Mladek
2020-01-22 12:15 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-22 15:05 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-22 22:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-01-23 10:19 ` Martin Jambor
2019-10-16 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-16 10:20 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-10-16 13:29 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-10-18 13:03 ` Jessica Yu
2019-10-18 13:40 ` Petr Mladek
2019-10-21 14:14 ` Jessica Yu [this message]
2019-10-21 15:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-22 8:27 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-10-22 14:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-23 9:04 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-10-16 6:51 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-10-16 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-16 9:36 ` Jessica Yu
2019-10-16 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-16 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-22 8:45 ` Miroslav Benes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191021141419.GB21112@linux-8ccs \
--to=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox