live-patching.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
	sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 03/11] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:56:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117145608.6781-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Rename "struct stackframe" to "struct unwind_state" for consistency and
better naming. Accordingly, rename variable/argument "frame" to "state".

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 66 ++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index e77cdef9ca29..41ec360515f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct stack_info {
  *               associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
  *               value.
  */
-struct stackframe {
+struct unwind_state {
 	unsigned long fp;
 	unsigned long pc;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b980d96dccfc..a1a7ff93b84f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,13 +33,13 @@
  */
 
 
-static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
+static void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp,
 			unsigned long pc)
 {
-	frame->fp = fp;
-	frame->pc = pc;
+	state->fp = fp;
+	state->pc = pc;
 #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
-	frame->kr_cur = NULL;
+	state->kr_cur = NULL;
 #endif
 
 	/*
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
 	 * prev_fp value won't be used, but we set it to 0 such that it is
 	 * definitely not an accessible stack address.
 	 */
-	bitmap_zero(frame->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
-	frame->prev_fp = 0;
-	frame->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
+	bitmap_zero(state->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
+	state->prev_fp = 0;
+	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static void unwind_init(struct stackframe *frame, unsigned long fp,
  * and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
  */
 static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
-			       struct stackframe *frame)
+			       struct unwind_state *state)
 {
-	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
+	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
 
 	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (test_bit(info.type, frame->stacks_done))
+	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/*
@@ -95,27 +95,27 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	 * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
 	 * stack.
 	 */
-	if (info.type == frame->prev_type) {
-		if (fp <= frame->prev_fp)
+	if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
+		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	} else {
-		set_bit(frame->prev_type, frame->stacks_done);
+		set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
 	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Record this frame record's values and location. The prev_fp and
 	 * prev_type are only meaningful to the next unwind_next() invocation.
 	 */
-	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
-	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
-	frame->prev_fp = fp;
-	frame->prev_type = info.type;
+	state->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+	state->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
+	state->prev_fp = fp;
+	state->prev_type = info.type;
 
-	frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc);
+	state->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(state->pc);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 	if (tsk->ret_stack &&
-		(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
+		(state->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
 		unsigned long orig_pc;
 		/*
 		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
@@ -123,16 +123,16 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		 * to hook a function return.
 		 * So replace it to an original value.
 		 */
-		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, frame->pc,
-						(void *)frame->fp);
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->pc == orig_pc))
+		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, state->pc,
+						(void *)state->fp);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		frame->pc = orig_pc;
+		state->pc = orig_pc;
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
 #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
-	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(frame->pc))
-		frame->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)frame->fp, &frame->kr_cur);
+	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(state->pc))
+		state->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)state->fp, &state->kr_cur);
 #endif
 
 	return 0;
@@ -140,15 +140,15 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
 
 static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
-			   struct stackframe *frame,
+			   struct unwind_state *state,
 			   bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
 {
 	while (1) {
 		int ret;
 
-		if (!fn(data, frame->pc))
+		if (!fn(data, state->pc))
 			break;
-		ret = unwind_next(tsk, frame);
+		ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -192,17 +192,17 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
 			      void *cookie, struct task_struct *task,
 			      struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	struct stackframe frame;
+	struct unwind_state state;
 
 	if (regs)
-		unwind_init(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
+		unwind_init(&state, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
 	else if (task == current)
-		unwind_init(&frame,
+		unwind_init(&state,
 				(unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1),
 				(unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
 	else
-		unwind_init(&frame, thread_saved_fp(task),
+		unwind_init(&state, thread_saved_fp(task),
 				thread_saved_pc(task));
 
-	unwind(task, &frame, consume_entry, cookie);
+	unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
 }
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f>
2022-01-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v13 00/11] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55   ` [PATCH v13 01/11] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55   ` [PATCH v13 02/11] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` madvenka [this message]
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-02-02 18:44     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03  0:26       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03  0:39         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 11:29           ` Mark Brown
2022-02-15 13:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 18:04       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state madvenka
2022-02-02 18:45     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-15 13:22     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-22 16:53       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind() madvenka
2022-02-02 18:46     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03  0:34       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 11:30         ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 14:45           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 13:39     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 18:12       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 16:51       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 17:01         ` Mark Brown
2022-03-08 22:00           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-09 11:47             ` Mark Brown
2022-03-09 15:34               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-10  8:33               ` Miroslav Benes
2022-03-10 12:36                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-16  3:43               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 14:44         ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 17:58           ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-10 17:42             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:33           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:45           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 07/11] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 08/11] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 09/11] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 10/11] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka
2022-01-25  5:21     ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-25 13:43       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-26 10:20         ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 17:14           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-27  1:13             ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 17:16       ` Mark Brown
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] objtool: Parse DWARF Call Frame Information in object files madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] objtool: Generate DWARF rules and place them in a special section madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/9] dwarf: Build the kernel with DWARF information madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF rule processing in the kernel madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF support for modules madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on DWARF CFI madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] arm64: dwarf: Implement unwind hints madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 8/9] dwarf: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] dwarf: Enable livepatch for ARM64 madvenka
2022-04-08  0:21   ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 11:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 17:26       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:18     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-12  8:32       ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-16  0:56         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 12:28           ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-18 16:11             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 18:38               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
     [not found]       ` <844b3ede-eddb-cbe6-80e0-3529e2da2eb6@huawei.com>
2022-04-12 17:27         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-16  1:07       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-14 14:11     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-08 10:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 14:34       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-10 17:47     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 16:34       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 12:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 17:35     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220117145608.6781-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).