From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v14 1/7] arm64: Split unwind_init()
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:05:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220413140528.3815-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220413140528.3815-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
unwind_init() is currently a single function that initializes all of the
unwind state. Split it into the following functions and call them
appropriately:
- unwind_init_from_regs() - initialize from regs passed by caller.
- unwind_init_from_caller() - initialize for the current task
from the caller of arch_stack_walk().
- unwind_init_from_task() - initialize from the saved state of a
task other than the current task. In this case, the other
task must not be running.
This is done for two reasons:
- the different ways of initializing are clear
- specialized code can be added to each initializer in the future.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 0467cb79f080..e44f93ff25f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -50,11 +50,8 @@ struct unwind_state {
#endif
};
-static notrace void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp,
- unsigned long pc)
+static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- state->fp = fp;
- state->pc = pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
@@ -72,7 +69,57 @@ static notrace void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp,
state->prev_fp = 0;
state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_init);
+
+/*
+ * Start an unwind from a pt_regs.
+ *
+ * The unwind will begin at the PC within the regs.
+ *
+ * The regs must be on a stack currently owned by the calling task.
+ */
+static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ unwind_init_common(state);
+
+ state->fp = regs->regs[29];
+ state->pc = regs->pc;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Start an unwind from a caller.
+ *
+ * The unwind will begin at the caller of whichever function this is inlined
+ * into.
+ *
+ * The function which invokes this must be noinline.
+ */
+static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_caller(struct unwind_state *state)
+{
+ unwind_init_common(state);
+
+ state->fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1);
+ state->pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Start an unwind from a blocked task.
+ *
+ * The unwind will begin at the blocked tasks saved PC (i.e. the caller of
+ * cpu_switch_to()).
+ *
+ * The caller should ensure the task is blocked in cpu_switch_to() for the
+ * duration of the unwind, or the unwind will be bogus. It is never valid to
+ * call this for the current task.
+ */
+static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ unwind_init_common(state);
+
+ state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
+ state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
+}
/*
* Unwind from one frame record (A) to the next frame record (B).
@@ -213,14 +260,11 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
struct unwind_state state;
if (regs)
- unwind_init(&state, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
+ unwind_init_from_regs(&state, regs);
else if (task == current)
- unwind_init(&state,
- (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1),
- (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
+ unwind_init_from_caller(&state);
else
- unwind_init(&state, thread_saved_fp(task),
- thread_saved_pc(task));
+ unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f460a35f88195413bcf7305e5083480aab3ca858>
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-04-13 14:05 ` madvenka [this message]
2022-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH v14 1/7] arm64: Split unwind_init() Mark Brown
2022-05-18 5:20 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 2/7] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state madvenka
2022-05-10 18:18 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-18 5:21 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 3/7] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 4/7] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 5/7] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 6/7] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH v14 7/7] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka
2022-04-13 14:11 ` [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-02 22:40 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-14 17:48 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-15 19:19 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220413140528.3815-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).