From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: pmladek@suse.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
jikos@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
"Yafang Shao" <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 for-next 2/8] livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:06:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825120608.BAB401F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825114641.80452-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential use-after-free of kobject delayed work structs during error cleanup if CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is enabled.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v7 for-next 2/8] livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier ---
commit b5f9135d749ffc4d6ea6c6a68a0fc6489e7a1cbf
Author: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier
Invoke klp_init_patch_early() during early initialization to avoid mixing
for_each_() and for_each_*_static() variants later in the code.
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,14 @@ int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
>
> klp_init_patch_early(patch);
>
> + if (!klp_is_patch_compatible(patch)) {
> + pr_err("Livepatch patch (%s) is not compatible with the already installed livepatches.\n",
> + patch->mod->name);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path expose a use-after-free
of kobject delayed work structs when CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is enabled?
Because kobject_add() has not yet run (it runs later in klp_init_patch()), the
child kobjects (obj and func) do not have their parent pointers set to
patch->kobj during this cleanup path.
When the error path jumps to err and calls klp_free_patch_start(), it drops
references to the child kobjects. Since their parent pointers aren't set,
putting the child kobjects does not elevate or pin the parent patch->kobj.
Consequently, the wait_for_completion() in klp_free_patch_finish() only waits
for the patch kobject to finish releasing, but not the child kobjects:
kernel/livepatch/core.c:klp_free_patch_finish() {
...
kobject_put(&patch->kobj);
wait_for_completion(&patch->finish);
/* Put the module after the last access to struct klp_patch. */
if (!patch->forced)
module_put(patch->mod);
}
This allows the module memory to be completely freed while the delayed work
for the child obj and func kobjects (which reside in the now-freed module
memory) might still be queued. When the workqueue executes them, it results in
a use-after-free.
While this issue already existed for klp_init_patch() failures, moving
klp_is_patch_compatible() after klp_init_patch_early() makes it trivially
reachable by simply providing an incompatible livepatch.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825114641.80452-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 11:46 [PATCH v7 for-next 0/8] livepatch: Introduce replace set support Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 1/8] livepatch: Make klp_find_func() non static Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 2/8] livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 12:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-25 12:11 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-27 23:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-28 2:24 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 3/8] livepatch: Implement replace set for scoped atomic replace Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 12:10 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-28 0:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-28 3:03 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-28 3:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-28 5:42 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 7:31 ` Replace rules: was: " Petr Mladek
2026-09-02 9:40 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 11:50 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-03 10:01 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-06 2:58 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-03 9:27 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-03 21:18 ` Song Liu
2026-09-06 8:34 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 7:34 ` documentation: " Petr Mladek
2026-09-02 9:50 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-03 7:30 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-02 7:37 ` code cleanup: " Petr Mladek
2026-09-02 9:52 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 4/8] livepatch: Deprecate stack_order Yafang Shao
2026-08-28 0:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-28 3:14 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 12:01 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-02 12:20 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 5/8] selftests/livepatch: Adapt atomic replace tests to provides/obsoletes Yafang Shao
2026-08-28 0:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-28 3:56 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 13:45 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-03 3:23 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 6/8] selftests/livepatch: Add provides/obsoletes test scenarios Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 15:15 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-03 5:43 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 7/8] selftests/livepatch: Add test for state ID conflict across provides Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 15:25 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-03 5:44 ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-25 11:46 ` [PATCH v7 for-next 8/8] selftests/livepatch: Add test for function " Yafang Shao
2026-09-02 15:51 ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-03 5:48 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825120608.BAB401F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox