From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: jikos@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, song@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, "Yafang Shao" <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:56:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909025625.110F31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909024324.16002-5-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Fatal UAF / Kernel Panic on module unload due to unparented kobjects triggering delayed work in freed memory.
--
commit 92da60558ebea290d37fbe304d56429622a3eb02
Author: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier
Invoke klp_init_patch_early() during early initialization to avoid
mixing for_each_() and for_each_*_static() variants later in the code.
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index c34306ecfb0bb..f088955de8557 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1152,10 +1145,17 @@ int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
>
> klp_init_patch_early(patch);
>
> + if (!klp_is_patch_compatible(patch)) {
> + pr_err("Livepatch patch (%s) is not compatible with the already installed livepatches.\n",
> + patch->mod->name);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but moving the compatibility check after
klp_init_patch_early() makes it highly reachable when an incompatible
patch is loaded. Could this lead to a use-after-free and kernel panic
during module unload?
When klp_init_patch_early() runs, it calls kobject_init() for child obj
and func objects. However, their parent pointers are not set until later
in klp_init_patch() via kobject_add().
If klp_is_patch_compatible() fails here, the error path calls
klp_free_patch_start() which puts these unparented child kobjects. Under
CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, their release functions are scheduled
asynchronously with a random delay.
Because the children lack parent pointers, they do not hold a reference to
patch->kobj. As a result, klp_free_patch_finish() will complete immediately
when waiting on patch->finish, and module_put(patch->mod) allows the module
to unload, freeing the statically allocated obj and func structures.
Later, when delayed release functions like klp_kobj_release_object() finally
execute, they will dereference obj->dynamic in freed memory.
> ret = klp_init_patch(patch);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909024324.16002-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 2:43 [PATCH v8 0/9] livepatch: Add support for scoped atomic replace Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] selftests/livepatch: Clarify test module file names Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 5:22 ` Song Liu
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] selftests/livepatch: Adapt atomic replace tests to provides/obsoletes Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 5:27 ` Song Liu
2026-09-09 6:59 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] livepatch: Make klp_find_func() non static Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 3:44 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] livepatch: Implement provides and obsoletes for scoped atomic replace Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] livepatch: Deprecate stack_order Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] selftests/livepatch: Add provides/obsoletes test scenarios Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] selftests/livepatch: Add state test for provides/obsoletes Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 7:30 ` Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] selftests/livepatch: Add function " Yafang Shao
2026-09-09 2:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 7:01 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909025625.110F31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox