From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF8C1494CC for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 18:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736618440; cv=none; b=ml2b0ZEcFviN4YmIPNihWZS/dTVBTl0Tu2SMDYmm+V0RcMNYQc4Gn3C+CMzOECPKszx9eKbl+Mj/yol/fI4sE9+IdW+1OMGSANYNSvtj/aYV3R4icMoq907dF55/KYvlKQ0z1Jn8Fl3MWSJ2DMJoP/iqYr5iYS7sEeQEaCHBj0k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736618440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rl4tzMbjTVPrZL8vIZg0CsU+U4RCupZ142ByB8y5vNA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=uMdq8MU7s8q5u9YiyMfgwyr889HuI3gXM9sndmTk4bwV8Cap3QPelFzvrfF42jPrXREfsQW2uCepSZFQJvr6AzcJmrRh15Qz2Fm7vxiC06IUPIxqD6sLtD+lIXAfOpoe7YR6PG+chSsEg12Mkb+61pS50CdnrkhIvNGwfgDBPMQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=AzB8vYm8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="AzB8vYm8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736618437; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=65m01HXSlqOBQF0X6QUSrEpGfIBoOq9A2r6WX82xrgk=; b=AzB8vYm8cdmWtbGHKFds9On9i3pwXYtAQGR46EywRC48ogFZICdX1FL6jn765G2AVtZ9lv 21CpJovhi7gd6M8euEA6kW/69MNAhM8ezNW/mpPEBJP3w7NqZPRJVFk4wkvLm7gLHrKX9i 9mVm6jBj1PohHX3FNa0MCZRSBNzsPDY= Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-689-YebiG8oHN6OhKj8GndsfFw-1; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:00:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YebiG8oHN6OhKj8GndsfFw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: YebiG8oHN6OhKj8GndsfFw Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7b6e5c9ef38so509510685a.1 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:00:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736618435; x=1737223235; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=65m01HXSlqOBQF0X6QUSrEpGfIBoOq9A2r6WX82xrgk=; b=J8sJ8F8HbeK/N81Xz3bUXIy8zshV6M1nOgHbOXrMNLbxssEJTpiv7GxN0vm56o/g1o D7RhzoyAz4v+Zbw1C1HmV7gaPvocXW/GIjH5NaGK4g06dJAKLR9iFAQ2KANG6R+NcCsQ 46MLZSVgS2q6XyRFkXIAIN+dbyNOu+7qcGQs1JEcLjFP/wfdAoW0B7KfKupiI8Kb0BrS 7JF1Z2jo8Q2fFTXj26azzN7+Z9cWo6aZL+9k8dsw2HJS70a3R+/3dGxtFVTJNca8xY0y JV4o2BtIh7nll+8P/qf8olEbDk49GcWmd+wzZH2L/JC7rU+ZvWoek7hF5p6i6ZpZQI2h hMqg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVJ3kpLgC/XxDDXo1ydlACN0jjLJEVVJR4P+laGbSjeegbsVE4hSM1As6zOqQLSiIoT9J7fDBqNh9bpTiZp@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxhfvxRrWgUdt/DFj3Mps4T+6IuRUJQ2JWu30FJ2gaWR5okDcAl tKdHNmGRnA/g/4ZQXBBJFL6GT0ejwqbj9fK2TSTTPeYfsl5QM5i3Yh8Ojj34fSgbLf0OnUHqscA X265a8/OAZzHlriVDFUgVPylkg1yRRGfASJeYdyTBq0wzBUHlpJGzOMnK+IsDO/o= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvLsnD+eoqcVgD973CT7z+kgacla1bzu/C6VgR50Q6ZZoSwL5cZvW5vtP3t/Yq PmBNKUunyVaLENuRMo1ODjIME4K3LgJFgmD8EWCiUwgX89+QkrdfBUsVQBsLOxWjhtpxE92zkBs uxO7xoEEF0XnGXO5eMan/w20Ka/cDCzjy9oaPPBewi1nxs3RXa0UdAtfach758sIR2HgC0AFCuF AX/cIfjRwFMW91V5e3eX1JZYdH4mPn1sPUx1CK6nO4jZS0uuyzSuRRm9FYuq6dbc71KMgck4MMw raqQDC4n0CJGSxb0mYpYj1fjZ41Xz+gowjadiHA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4e50:b0:7b6:d237:abfa with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7bcf3670440mr376712185a.21.1736618435655; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:00:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUdu/RdQiy62AcFdeOz8EqMSt9UG6Qp5/L1AaHX+TMZ/CBG16QzRl866a0rluy1MJWs1zVjw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4e50:b0:7b6:d237:abfa with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7bcf3670440mr376708085a.21.1736618435329; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:00:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-68-160-135-240.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [68.160.135.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7bce3238003sm303883985a.2.2025.01.11.10.00.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:00:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20867ce3-901c-7821-fe02-ccd223fdcf17@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:00:31 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: livepatch: test if ftrace can trace a livepatched function Content-Language: en-US To: Filipe Xavier Cc: Marcos Paulo de Souza , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Petr Mladek , Shuah Khan , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Xavier References: <20250102-ftrace-selftest-livepatch-v1-1-84880baefc1b@gmail.com> <9edd671a-be5e-41c9-a8dc-b1fd1d5e3375@gmail.com> From: Joe Lawrence In-Reply-To: <9edd671a-be5e-41c9-a8dc-b1fd1d5e3375@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 1/10/25 12:13, Filipe Xavier wrote: > Em 07/01/2025 13:23, Joe Lawrence escreveu: > >> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 03:42:10PM -0300, Filipe Xavier wrote: >>> This new test makes sure that ftrace can trace a >>> function that was introduced by a livepatch. >>> >> Hi Filipe, >> >> Thanks for adding a test! >> >> Aside: another similar test could verify that the original function, in >> this case cmdline_proc_show(), can still be traced despite it being >> livepatched.  That may be non-intuitive but it demonstrates how the >> ftrace handler works. > > Thanks for the review Joe! > > I have fixed all points mentioned below, > > and have a patch ready to submit. > > Do you believe that this other similar test could be sent later, > > or is it required in this patch? > The second test could be added later if you like, either way is fine w/me. Thanks, -- Joe