From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, chenzhongjin@huawei.com,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, tangyouling00@gmail.com,
youling.tang@outlook.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/23] LoongArch: Add objtool and ORC unwinder support
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:32:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f611195a5b3d1bf97e650fb441e21e434d8d889.camel@xry111.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62d25870-2caa-18ab-e58c-cee0bc383e16@loongson.cn>
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 16:29 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> Hi, Ruoyao
>
> On 06/20/2023 04:15 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > It looks like only 19 patches are successfully delivered, out of 23.
> I'm sorry, somehow the patchset didn't reach the mailing list. Probably
> due to the sending limit being reached.
They've reached now. Thanks!
> > And AFAIK objtool needs libelf from elfutils, and the LoongArch support
> > in elfutils is not complete (there are about ten failures in the test
> > suite as at the latest 0.189 release). Do we need to add more LoongArch
> > support into libelf and/or declare a minimal needed libelf version for
> > LoongArch objtool?
> After the following series of patches [1], the elfutils test results
> are passed.
>
> [1]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2023q2/006107.html
Wow thanks, I'll add them into my build. But I'm not sure if we need a
libelf version check or something in the kernel building system.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-20 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-20 7:46 [RFC PATCH v1 00/23] LoongArch: Add objtool and ORC unwinder support Youling Tang
2023-06-20 7:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/23] objtool: Reorganize CFI code Youling Tang
2023-06-20 7:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/23] objtool: Reorganize instruction-related code Youling Tang
2023-06-20 7:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/23] objtool: Move decode_instructions() to a separate file Youling Tang
2023-06-20 7:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/23] objtool: Reorganize Unwind hint code Youling Tang
2023-06-20 8:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/23] LoongArch: Add objtool and ORC unwinder support Xi Ruoyao
2023-06-20 8:29 ` Youling Tang
2023-06-20 8:32 ` Xi Ruoyao [this message]
2023-06-20 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-20 8:48 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-06-20 8:49 ` Youling Tang
2023-06-20 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f611195a5b3d1bf97e650fb441e21e434d8d889.camel@xry111.site \
--to=xry111@xry111.site \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tangyouling00@gmail.com \
--cc=tangyouling@loongson.cn \
--cc=youling.tang@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox