From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com (mail-ej1-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E83D45BEC for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Jg+Cez0O" Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a28da6285c1so801943166b.0 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:51:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1704912706; x=1705517506; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SUi+vVjnlXvuMiah1i251N0KCiLVzvP6N7O0UZtD65o=; b=Jg+Cez0OsoADfYSEjMo7zNEnDOQfu95tEapunyPFcfYxd7t2yy5vw2BbuqTHL9wi2H nozEpiJwpX0xQmavLg+j7IyY+lQDJXYUOV8CtilXqfESpEntsBKyejAU+t8YbxfFOVx7 +Bqra0qO9HOCVFbCXji5nr3gYqeP/6QEX6qacLOa95IDs2p6k3Pu9b4dgJZtgL21sYlc BP/QhrIGIb0aqOdFSMWeZhFEDuc+QeUFoRTdLGvr/mhKBmhdwtp5m0JOpr5lWCkAu/RR PzLRzAG8m17+UYeRYvylYNnz1SKQA2kXzcX4U5CityUQCV2Zb9QaTkbBhR4m1PPRzNNO eMNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704912706; x=1705517506; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SUi+vVjnlXvuMiah1i251N0KCiLVzvP6N7O0UZtD65o=; b=Ce6pVZ71lnypZMDy5NAN4GZ8HOMbm161cLsC+PP+zRm72CIcyTVNlPyhWu9nkh9t5Z n0ome3k5RRk4fALAJKg7aEvVE9jJm6RQDY6S4Ds1RGs6Kxll7JrLKiGR5IdL9N6pJxeM bmRfUi4OA+0uOrOSCQ0dP75OFPp35EM+nO8CXeWgl82Fr5mojd+//diU9FxwMCkl4/QG Hs6UucI/ZScpmRPrxYda2lVY9RjRtE50AqmhAfzU9RSpCvnEkwILB+JR50jcsl5Y1VXF 81aZNRgEwbBLHeBOWawhLySUefspt3A8WAJmmwAfhVtNKhYB6Mk5MtVrBk/jknwCqHf0 +avA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwhnCAS/FqM7/P3N6jmcvV1Xl79G4VzhU07NE/P/C2gsHYgEPoj xoj5to9DKYYssm5Op6PC6kezLikst4AWQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFIr7fU1mieZ/hu3Aq23BdynryneyJZb4/Z7tb05MemWRgr1IqJ5Tw04abHCb3B4mcLOIOUzA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:868b:b0:a29:b898:93cc with SMTP id qa11-20020a170907868b00b00a29b89893ccmr617682ejc.28.1704912705877; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:51:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:30c:1668:b300:8fcd:588d:fb77:ed04? ([2804:30c:1668:b300:8fcd:588d:fb77:ed04]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12-20020a170902ee0c00b001d536a910fasm4002413plb.77.2024.01.10.10.51.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:51:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49cfdce3094fcc37ecf01bb358509c64ee8feed9.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/livepatch: Update terminology in livepatch From: Marcos Paulo de Souza To: Jonathan Corbet , Attreyee M , Bagas Sanjaya Cc: jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:51:40 -0300 In-Reply-To: <87jzohoy02.fsf@meer.lwn.net> References: <20231223205813.32083-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com> <87o7eg607d.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <87jzohoy02.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 11:15 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Attreyee M writes: >=20 > > Hello maintainers,=20 > >=20 > > I wanted to ask if this patch of mine is accepted as of now.=20 >=20 > You never responded to the question that is still quoted in your > (unfortunately top-posted) email: >=20 > > So this is a classic example of saying what you have done, but not > > why. > > What makes this a change that we want? >=20 > So no, not accepted.=C2=A0 Even with a proper changelog, though, I'm not > sure > I see the value in that particular change. >From time to time I see people complaining about the lack of new people coming to kernel development, and that Documentation would be a good start for some of them to learn how to send patches by email (which by itself is difficult...). As Documentation patches aren't backported, why not accept this patch? Jon, I understand your reasoning, but I agree with Attreyee here. The term "acquire" fits better when in conjunction with "released" than "get". Can you show an example of a good commit message to Attreyee so he can adjust and resend? I'm sure the next time he'll consider remember the suggestion given and the next patch will have a better commit message. Thanks, Marcos >=20 > jon >=20