From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kselftests: livepatch: Adapt tests to be executed on 4.12 kernels
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 09:12:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ab30eed1165bcd68395e32d8ab61d7437a8ccf6.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260413-lp-tests-old-fixes-v2-0-367c7cb5006f@suse.com>
On Mon, 2026-04-13 at 14:26 -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> A new version of the patchset, with fewer patches now. Please take a
> look!
>
> Original cover-letter:
> These patches don't really change how the patches are run, just skip
> some tests on kernels that don't support a feature (like kprobe and
> livepatched living together) or when a livepatch sysfs attribute is
> missing.
>
> The last patch slightly adjusts check_result function to skip dmesg
> messages on SLE kernels when a livepatch is removed.
>
> These patches are based on printk/for-next branch.
>
> Please review! Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
I saw some checks made by sashiko, and besides they not being so
horrible, I believe that I should fix me an send a v3 to address them.
But still, feel free to take a look :)
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260413-lp-tests-old-fixes-v2-0-367c7cb5006f%40suse.com
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Patch descriptions were changed to remove "test-X", since it was
> polluting the commit subjects (Miroslav Benes)
> - Patch 8 was dropped since it was checking for a message from an
> out-of-tree patch. (Petr Mladek)
> - Patch 3 was dropped as should be treated as expected failure for
> older kernels. (Petr Mladek)
> - Patch 2 was changed to use y/n instead of 1/0, since it's more
> natural to use it.
> - Patch 1 was changed to handle ppc and loongson, and error out if
> dealing with a different architecture that sets
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER and haven't changed the test to
> include the proper wrapper prefix.
> - Patch 4 was changed to invert the return of the bash function to
> return 1 in failure, like
> a normal bash function (Joe Lawrence)
> - Patches 5, 6 an 7 were changed to not split the tests, but to only
> run the tests
> when the attribute were present (Miroslav Benes)
> - Link to v1:
> https://patch.msgid.link/20260313-lp-tests-old-fixes-v1-0-71ac6dfb3253@suse.com
>
> ---
> Marcos Paulo de Souza (6):
> selftests: livepatch: Check for ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER config
> selftests: livepatch: Replace true/false module parameter by
> y/n
> selftests: livepatch: Introduce does_sysfs_exists function
> selftests: livepatch: Check if patched sysfs attribute exists
> selftests: livepatch: Check if replace sysfs attribute exists
> selftests: livepatch: Check if stack_order sysfs attribute
> exists
>
> tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh | 10 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh | 8 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-sysfs.sh | 120
> ++++++++++++---------
> .../livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c | 17 ++-
> 4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 712c0756828becbfc629ff8d8b82deff5d1115e4
> change-id: 20260309-lp-tests-old-fixes-f955abc8ec27
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 17:26 [PATCH v2 0/6] kselftests: livepatch: Adapt tests to be executed on 4.12 kernels Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] selftests: livepatch: Check for ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER config Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-15 9:58 ` Miroslav Benes
2026-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] selftests: livepatch: Replace true/false module parameter by y/n Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] selftests: livepatch: Introduce does_sysfs_exists function Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests: livepatch: Check if patched sysfs attribute exists Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests: livepatch: Check if replace " Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: livepatch: Check if stack_order " Marcos Paulo de Souza
2026-04-14 12:12 ` Marcos Paulo de Souza [this message]
2026-04-15 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] kselftests: livepatch: Adapt tests to be executed on 4.12 kernels Miroslav Benes
2026-04-15 12:37 ` Marcos Paulo de Souza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ab30eed1165bcd68395e32d8ab61d7437a8ccf6.camel@suse.com \
--to=mpdesouza@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox