From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: "mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Cc: "cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"mbenes@suse.cz" <mbenes@suse.cz>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"jeyu@kernel.org" <jeyu@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
"live-patching@vger.kernel.org" <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>,
"atomlin@atomlin.com" <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
"ghalat@redhat.com" <ghalat@redhat.com>,
"allen.lkml@gmail.com" <allen.lkml@gmail.com>,
"void@manifault.com" <void@manifault.com>,
"joe@perches.com" <joe@perches.com>,
"msuchanek@suse.de" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
"oleksandr@natalenko.name" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:00:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d6cbfe4-ee1a-ec5f-4249-c25ab6142668@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209171118.3269581-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
Le 09/02/2022 à 18:11, Aaron Tomlin a écrit :
> No functional change.
>
> This patch migrates module sysfs support out of core code into
> kernel/module/sysfs.c. In addition simple code refactoring to
> make this possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/module/Makefile | 1 +
> kernel/module/internal.h | 24 ++
> kernel/module/main.c | 458 +--------------------------------------
> kernel/module/sysfs.c | 425 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 453 insertions(+), 455 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 kernel/module/sysfs.c
Checkpatch:
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 10 checks, 946 lines checked
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module/Makefile b/kernel/module/Makefile
> index c6be08060252..c30141c37eb3 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/module/Makefile
> @@ -14,4 +14,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) += strict_rwx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK) += debug_kmemleak.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KALLSYMS) += kallsyms.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += procfs.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSFS) += sysfs.o
> endif
> diff --git a/kernel/module/internal.h b/kernel/module/internal.h
> index b67ce836746a..52d30bf6d6b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/module/internal.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
> extern struct mutex module_mutex;
> extern struct list_head modules;
>
> +extern struct module_attribute *modinfo_attrs[];
> +extern size_t modinfo_attrs_count;
Can't this come in sysfs.c as well ?
> +
> /* Provided by the linker */
> extern const struct kernel_symbol __start___ksymtab[];
> extern const struct kernel_symbol __stop___ksymtab[];
> @@ -206,3 +209,24 @@ static inline char *find_kallsyms_symbol(struct module *mod, unsigned long addr,
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_KALLSYMS */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> +int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info,
> + struct kernel_param *kparam, unsigned int num_params);
> +void mod_sysfs_fini(struct module *mod);
> +void module_remove_modinfo_attrs(struct module *mod, int end);
> +void del_usage_links(struct module *mod);
> +void init_param_lock(struct module *mod);
Why don't we move mod_sysfs_teardown() here as well ?
It looks strange to move mod_sysfs_setup() and not mod_sysfs_teardown()
> +#else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */
> +static int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod,
> + const struct load_info *info,
> + struct kernel_param *kparam,
> + unsigned int num_params)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline void mod_sysfs_fini(struct module *mod) { }
> +static inline void module_remove_modinfo_attrs(struct module *mod, int end) { }
> +static inline void del_usage_links(struct module *mod) { }
> +static inline void init_param_lock(struct module *mod) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 17:11 [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 17:11 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 14:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-13 14:14 ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 17:11 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 14:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-13 18:03 ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-13 18:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15 15:05 ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-15 15:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-17 15:51 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-02-17 16:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 14:00 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-02-13 13:32 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs " Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d6cbfe4-ee1a-ec5f-4249-c25ab6142668@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=ghalat@redhat.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox