From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com [209.85.208.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6028847A74 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Gdl71Hfl" Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cd1ca52f31so44793271fa.3 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 03:52:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1704887577; x=1705492377; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8ascI3xEuxrf+bAlJwJVPOceO1Ba41fBXLhKR9/Lb0M=; b=Gdl71Hflbb407enSn4alWalPSH5SsIQ0ZHIaaZe8D0u71yhZnbDkHrWE+PUL1owm2o cjfTmFw9+XXgEYlcYdoe/eP7WCse1jBOeXk2BX7AHPycWdfljlKpqiHriUdQEEwDuXYT y1MqCMy4HQakc+VpEdEXQ8dfGjKp09AQ+euLWSO+0igJ/4U7B/PHcvpYkklV1TMb4A9w dn1bQcUSi6JCGyxU/EDFWdoeIvRRDoENvqEzFDQfTQGuxXBft8jnwBZ0x7wiPqA1FiL3 HCkUilfuJg1vb7HR+AOtbsegGL9siSg9G6L/1ZfhAqVc68x4qzjwKINFfdfu3Noz4y9P XB2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704887577; x=1705492377; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8ascI3xEuxrf+bAlJwJVPOceO1Ba41fBXLhKR9/Lb0M=; b=NGrwkAv1CCfXxQr9Yy0SD8gaqucZwfsG+YADbqSJ+5IvCCEirRGQE4E87nJWJlhah4 i40SRzrhFhKMBidqjfuipC4kg1TdgUx1A05gbaETxDYrjmzijtsURNCKYGYTzRvHL8wQ jn/Dx9Wc7AZk1p92e5+S7vTmOBXI6e5aGwfAI8GE78GhIw6pf1nU1jpvnR1bKahRC8fk fCfqcH1AEyvGy4WDaraMIyEEvahi5rzPrUu+qYl9FihnozoCCs34JB5Egivu64Co97lV e/mtvngD96RH4GKMPVveqPtJ2cRJJHrl4RgAY7L0kQS0IxcmLIInT/Fm7HYSx5vrtt0+ 8RuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxvUgyYTiFkW+/4TQMa+cVVJzuYL0kXjuXG8hl7Zpa92+PkRkyz 7EPwJyv0svdYRYEPyWSveJxE+GhG2AUZFXi4IvemR3UgFpM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFjRjXihoh86m+G3Yr5b8NvPJZa3SwH4ZNapMKpUeHWqNjgYy7MBcO323nu05pBRl0uC1fM4g== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9bc5:0:b0:2cc:77b0:7655 with SMTP id w5-20020a2e9bc5000000b002cc77b07655mr490080ljj.8.1704887577374; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 03:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:30c:1668:b300:8fcd:588d:fb77:ed04? ([2804:30c:1668:b300:8fcd:588d:fb77:ed04]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18-20020a5d81d2000000b007befc059cf2sm102410iol.6.2024.01.10.03.52.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 03:52:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <761e2fc21e72576a4704572b50d9fc5b4a1cb9e1.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: RFC: another way to make livepatch From: Marcos Paulo de Souza To: laokz , live-patching@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:52:49 -0300 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 22:06 +0800, laokz wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is it off-topic talking about livepatch making tool? I tried another > way and > want to get your expert opinion if there any fatal pitfall. I don't think it's out of scope, but what exactly you mean by "another way to make livepatch"? You would like to know about different approaches like source-based livepatch compared to kpatch, or you mean something different? Thanks! >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > laokz >=20 >=20