live-patching.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/6] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 08:39:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrgNSMnBzAF6rtYz@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220617210717.27126-3-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:07:13PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Copy the task argument passed to arch_stack_walk() to unwind_state so that
> it can be passed to unwind functions via unwind_state rather than as a
> separate argument. The task is a fundamental part of the unwind state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index e44f93ff25f0..8e43444d50e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
>   * @kr_cur:      When KRETPROBES is selected, holds the kretprobe instance
>   *               associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
>   *               value.
> + *
> + * @task:        The task being unwound.
>   */
>  struct unwind_state {
>  	unsigned long fp;
> @@ -48,10 +50,13 @@ struct unwind_state {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
>  	struct llist_node *kr_cur;
>  #endif
> +	struct task_struct *task;
>  };
>  
> -static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
> +static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
> +			       struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> +	state->task = task;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
>  	state->kr_cur = NULL;
>  #endif
> @@ -80,7 +85,7 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
>  static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
>  					 struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	unwind_init_common(state);
> +	unwind_init_common(state, current);
>  
>  	state->fp = regs->regs[29];
>  	state->pc = regs->pc;
> @@ -96,7 +101,7 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
>   */
>  static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_caller(struct unwind_state *state)
>  {
> -	unwind_init_common(state);
> +	unwind_init_common(state, current);
>  
>  	state->fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1);
>  	state->pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
> @@ -115,7 +120,7 @@ static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_caller(struct unwind_state *state)
>  static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
>  					 struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> -	unwind_init_common(state);
> +	unwind_init_common(state, task);
>  
>  	state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
>  	state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
> @@ -128,9 +133,9 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
>   * records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
>   * and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
>   */
> -static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
> -			       struct unwind_state *state)
> +static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>  {
> +	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
>  	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
>  	struct stack_info info;
>  
> @@ -204,8 +209,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>  
> -static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
> -			   struct unwind_state *state,
> +static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
>  			   stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
>  {
>  	while (1) {
> @@ -213,7 +217,7 @@ static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  
>  		if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
>  			break;
> -		ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
> +		ret = unwind_next(state);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  	}
> @@ -259,12 +263,15 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
>  {
>  	struct unwind_state state;
>  
> -	if (regs)
> +	if (regs) {
> +		if (task != current)
> +			return;
>  		unwind_init_from_regs(&state, regs);
> -	else if (task == current)
> +	} else if (task == current) {
>  		unwind_init_from_caller(&state);
> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
> +	}
>  
> -	unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
> +	unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-26  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ff68fb850d42e1adaa6a0a6c9c258acabb898b24>
2022-06-17 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v15 0/6] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-06-17 18:02   ` [RFC PATCH v15 1/6] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-06-17 18:02   ` [RFC PATCH v15 2/6] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state madvenka
2022-06-17 18:02   ` [RFC PATCH v15 3/6] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-06-17 18:02   ` [RFC PATCH v15 4/6] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-06-17 18:02   ` [RFC PATCH v15 5/6] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-06-17 18:02   ` [RFC PATCH v15 6/6] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-06-17 20:50   ` [RFC PATCH v15 0/6] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-27 13:00   ` Will Deacon
2022-06-27 17:06     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH " madvenka
2022-06-17 21:07   ` [PATCH v15 1/6] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-06-26  7:39     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-17 21:07   ` [PATCH v15 2/6] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state madvenka
2022-06-26  7:39     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-06-17 21:07   ` [PATCH v15 3/6] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-06-26  8:21     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-27  4:51       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-17 21:07   ` [PATCH v15 4/6] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-06-26  8:32     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-27  5:01       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-17 21:07   ` [PATCH v15 5/6] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-06-26  8:46     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-27  5:06       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-17 21:07   ` [PATCH v15 6/6] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-06-26  8:57     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-27  5:53       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-23 17:32   ` [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks Will Deacon
2022-06-24  5:19     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-24  5:27       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-26  9:18       ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-27  4:33         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-27 16:32           ` Kalesh Singh
2022-06-27 17:04             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-27  4:48         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-27  9:42           ` Will Deacon
2022-06-24 11:42     ` Mark Brown
2022-06-24 22:15       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YrgNSMnBzAF6rtYz@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).