From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f72.google.com (mail-io1-f72.google.com [209.85.166.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B7C219EE for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-io1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7b7fdde8b59so34572639f.3 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 04:47:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704372426; x=1704977226; h=to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lhdZhVM9hd6zS0zhf1fproBxRxVbTWRWZfmYHGWqTPE=; b=N7B0Fy3+W9Apj2PHFN0jtgS5qwl48xyAj6BMNXRnDis1DZvRsDLTo7VwZgY8bclHLP BdG17K8n8DLZg/2I6E5HEhK4XmCPKUCuf8pcKgiVi/pGTTbnQIcHjQNs6rF+KvrGyV1y c4B76E2+LEcMh/Vokps+gq00qmc4SAOvL+i9q9QI7rD0lwk0blQ5vZ0iuRJp4W9L123V c+DXrZbOt14pZ9D0OWt+GHXjYKQRH7r69sjTv5InZegC8AYsaipauQrf4IgthzS4oedy 4AXoXFYuqIh/Bjef2X1QbyMyT0wU6U8+adg+TX6fepLCzzBpO+ctvaWPp/6SND01BmtO GFNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4OEurBifbaWEvwtxVg3pCaqGSPwz7bXxwhmiG2s5drBdmTHib GvszDCsSaYwXkzcVOYnf7t97uzrJIgobD6QiwkjU5ufq+Vhk X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdu19ASS4QM2psMgOgjkgVZ30LHjYMpl4iRXmaNYOEpgfYr5/it1Xcqyz+Z1eSKAz81pY5l7sGQE3Xz8Y/nFo9GR+lSohm Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:6297:b0:44a:fe65:d743 with SMTP id fh23-20020a056638629700b0044afe65d743mr20982jab.0.1704372426058; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 04:47:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 04:47:06 -0800 In-Reply-To: X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <00000000000005306b060e1e218e@google.com> Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] general protection fault in hfsc_tcf_block From: syzbot To: jiri@resnulli.us, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue: Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+0039110f932d438130f9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested on: commit: 866c2695 net: sched: move block device tracking into t.. git tree: https://github.com/jpirko/linux_mlxsw.git wip_tc_block_fix console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14a03de9e80000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=a4e9ca8e3c104d2a dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0039110f932d438130f9 compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 Note: no patches were applied. Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.