From: syzbot <syzbot+be899d4f10b2a9522dce@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: agruenba@redhat.com, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rpeterso@redhat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [gfs2?] possible deadlock in freeze_super (2)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 07:58:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00000000000020f3ac05f0f98f86@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000b9753505eaa93b18@google.com>
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 1b929c02afd3 Linux 6.2-rc1
git tree: upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11447312480000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=68e0be42c8ee4bb4
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be899d4f10b2a9522dce
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14b638c0480000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=11b17270480000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2d8c5072480f/disk-1b929c02.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/46687f1395db/vmlinux-1b929c02.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/26f1afa5ec00/bzImage-1b929c02.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/952580c084c8/mount_0.gz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+be899d4f10b2a9522dce@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1H/52 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880277440e0 (&type->s_umount_key#44){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: freeze_super+0x45/0x420 fs/super.c:1655
but task is already holding lock:
ffffc90000bd7d00 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x831/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2264
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
process_one_work+0x852/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2265
worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
-> #1 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
__flush_workqueue+0x178/0x1680 kernel/workqueue.c:2809
gfs2_gl_hash_clear+0xa3/0x300 fs/gfs2/glock.c:2191
gfs2_put_super+0x862/0x8d0 fs/gfs2/super.c:627
generic_shutdown_super+0x130/0x310 fs/super.c:492
kill_block_super+0x79/0xd0 fs/super.c:1386
deactivate_locked_super+0xa7/0xf0 fs/super.c:332
cleanup_mnt+0x494/0x520 fs/namespace.c:1291
task_work_run+0x243/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:179
ptrace_notify+0x29a/0x340 kernel/signal.c:2354
ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline]
ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline]
syscall_exit_work+0x8c/0xe0 kernel/entry/common.c:251
syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x63/0xc0 kernel/entry/common.c:278
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xa/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:296
do_syscall_64+0x49/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (&type->s_umount_key#44){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1898/0x6ae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831
__lock_acquire+0x1292/0x1f60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
down_write+0x9c/0x270 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1562
freeze_super+0x45/0x420 fs/super.c:1655
freeze_go_sync+0x178/0x340 fs/gfs2/glops.c:577
do_xmote+0x34d/0x13d0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:708
glock_work_func+0x2c2/0x450 fs/gfs2/glock.c:1056
process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&type->s_umount_key#44 --> (wq_completion)glock_workqueue --> (work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work));
lock((wq_completion)glock_workqueue);
lock((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work));
lock(&type->s_umount_key#44);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1H/52:
#0: ffff888018293938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7f2/0xdb0
#1: ffffc90000bd7d00 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)
){+.+.}-{0:0}
, at: process_one_work+0x831/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2264
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Workqueue: glock_workqueue glock_work_func
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x290 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1898/0x6ae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831
__lock_acquire+0x1292/0x1f60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
down_write+0x9c/0x270 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1562
freeze_super+0x45/0x420 fs/super.c:1655
freeze_go_sync+0x178/0x340 fs/gfs2/glops.c:577
do_xmote+0x34d/0x13d0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:708
glock_work_func+0x2c2/0x450 fs/gfs2/glock.c:1056
process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
</TASK>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-29 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-10 7:37 [syzbot] possible deadlock in freeze_super (2) syzbot
2022-12-29 15:58 ` syzbot [this message]
2023-03-24 14:43 ` [syzbot] [cluster?] " syzbot
2023-04-03 6:23 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00000000000020f3ac05f0f98f86@google.com \
--to=syzbot+be899d4f10b2a9522dce@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).