From: syzbot <syzbot+9d95beb2a3c260622518@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in trie_delete_elem
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:39:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00000000000023808a061a1fa99a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PN2PR01MB489119119088A1E7091BB6B9FCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in trie_delete_elem
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00001-ge377d803b65e #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
udevd/5414 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807eff51f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807eff59f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&trie->lock);
lock(&trie->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
5 locks held by udevd/5414:
#0: ffff88801f3e8f08 (kn->active#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_open+0x93/0xd10 fs/kernfs/file.c:601
#1: ffff8880162ecc38 (&kernfs_locks->open_file_mutex[count]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock fs/kernfs/file.c:56 [inline]
#1: ffff8880162ecc38 (&kernfs_locks->open_file_mutex[count]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_get_open_node fs/kernfs/file.c:520 [inline]
#1: ffff8880162ecc38 (&kernfs_locks->open_file_mutex[count]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_open+0x74d/0xd10 fs/kernfs/file.c:700
#2: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2409 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x21f/0x570 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2451
#3: ffff88807eff59f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
#4: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2409 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x21f/0x570 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2451
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5414 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00001-ge377d803b65e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
bpf_prog_1db1603a7cfa36fb+0x45/0x49
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1243 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:691 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:698 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2410 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x30d/0x570 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2451
__traceiter_contention_end+0x7b/0xb0 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
trace_contention_end+0x114/0x140 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xb81/0xdc0 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:557
pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:584 [inline]
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x42/0x50 arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:51
queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:114 [inline]
do_raw_spin_lock+0x272/0x370 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:116
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xe1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
bpf_prog_1db1603a7cfa36fb+0x45/0x49
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1243 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:691 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:698 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2410 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x30d/0x570 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2451
__traceiter_contention_end+0x7b/0xb0 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
trace_contention_end+0xf5/0x120 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:617 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x2e5/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock fs/kernfs/file.c:56 [inline]
kernfs_get_open_node fs/kernfs/file.c:520 [inline]
kernfs_fop_open+0x74d/0xd10 fs/kernfs/file.c:700
do_dentry_open+0x95a/0x1720 fs/open.c:955
do_open fs/namei.c:3650 [inline]
path_openat+0x289f/0x3280 fs/namei.c:3807
do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3834
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1405
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1420 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1436 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1431
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f7f17b169a4
Code: 24 20 48 8d 44 24 30 48 89 44 24 28 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 2c 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 76 60 48 8b 15 55 a4 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 83
RSP: 002b:00007ffdf6fcc1a0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000008 RCX: 00007f7f17b169a4
RDX: 0000000000080000 RSI: 00007ffdf6fcc2d8 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c
RBP: 00007ffdf6fcc2d8 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000080000
R13: 000056111e750b42 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 000056111e76c160
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: e377d803 kernel/trace: fix possible deadlock in trie_d..
git tree: https://linux.googlesource.com/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=111a49bc980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=eb72437243175f22
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9d95beb2a3c260622518
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Note: no patches were applied.
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489119119088A1E7091BB6B9FCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 7:39 ` syzbot [this message]
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891E7B8CF9B3C1531CB9ADEFCFB2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-07 7:45 ` [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in trie_delete_elem syzbot
[not found] <20240606141413.137516-1-norkam41@gmail.com>
2024-06-06 14:38 ` syzbot
[not found] <20240606140352.135948-1-norkam41@gmail.com>
2024-06-06 14:26 ` syzbot
[not found] <20240606135139.134172-1-norkam41@gmail.com>
2024-06-06 13:55 ` syzbot
[not found] <MAXPR01MB316750CFC54579A6A384FF91F7FA2@MAXPR01MB3167.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:40 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891DFF0F26C14B0A7ED225EFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:39 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489146FC0041ED737236BE64FCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:17 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891F53CC6107BBDB25C8C09FCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:10 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489159F2619858474EF92FC5FCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 12:32 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489190072C2A23C3C1CCCE2FFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 12:12 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB48911035081582F4B9893F9FFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 11:47 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891AE31D63427B828C79ECBFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 9:27 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891BF795360AE31E349CFECFCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 8:24 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891734D357ACCDDD106F360FCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 7:57 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489171CD7B0E226F8256C23DFCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 7:17 ` syzbot
2024-03-20 8:42 syzbot
2024-03-20 10:32 ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-20 19:42 ` syzbot
2024-03-20 14:20 ` syzbot
2025-05-08 7:13 ` syzbot
2025-05-08 18:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-08 23:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00000000000023808a061a1fa99a@google.com \
--to=syzbot+9d95beb2a3c260622518@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox