[syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block

[syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block

[syzbot]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree:       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13ce2a7c880000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9
compiler:       Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

ntfs3: loop4: Different NTFS' sector size (1024) and media sector size (512)
ntfs3: loop4: Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/15497 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff000116476948 (&ni->file.run_lock#3){++++}-{3:3}, at: attr_data_get_block+0x84/0xa54 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:899

but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0xa0/0x1d0 mm/util.c:550

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
       __might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
       _copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
       copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
       fiemap_fill_next_extent+0xc4/0x1f8 fs/ioctl.c:144
       ni_fiemap+0x4cc/0x620 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2051
       ntfs_fiemap+0x9c/0xdc fs/ntfs3/file.c:1245
       ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:219 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0x10f0/0x16a4 fs/ioctl.c:810
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x98/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
       __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
       invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
       el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
       do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
       el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
       el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
       el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581

-> #0 (&ni->file.run_lock#3){++++}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
       lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
       down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
       attr_data_get_block+0x84/0xa54 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:899
       ntfs_file_mmap+0x1d0/0x2e4 fs/ntfs3/file.c:387
       call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
       mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
       do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
       vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
       ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
       __do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
       __se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
       __arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
       __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
       invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
       el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
       do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
       el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
       el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
       el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
                               lock(&ni->file.run_lock#3);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
  lock(&ni->file.run_lock#3);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.4/15497:
 #0: ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
 #0: ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0xa0/0x1d0 mm/util.c:550

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 15497 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
 show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
 dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
 check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
 lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
 down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
 attr_data_get_block+0x84/0xa54 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:899
 ntfs_file_mmap+0x1d0/0x2e4 fs/ntfs3/file.c:387
 call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
 mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
 do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
 __do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
 __se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
 invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
 el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block

[syzbot]

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    c2bf05db6c78 Merge tag 'i2c-for-6.1-rc8' of git://git.kern..
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1090bfbd880000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2325e409a9a893e1
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9
compiler:       Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1031c6cb880000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=15392bd5880000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4476d2eff1ae/disk-c2bf05db.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/0f4a704ffc14/vmlinux-c2bf05db.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dfb09481a98b/bzImage-c2bf05db.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9b8a62d1948c/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 4096
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00200-gc2bf05db6c78 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor598/3631 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888072430860 (&ni->ni_lock/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1108 [inline]
ffff888072430860 (&ni->ni_lock/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: attr_data_get_block+0x301/0x2370 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:917

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888022a38898 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
ffff888022a38898 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x14d/0x2b0 mm/util.c:518

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
       __might_fault+0xb2/0x110 mm/memory.c:5645
       _copy_to_user+0x26/0x130 lib/usercopy.c:29
       copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:169 [inline]
       fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x22e/0x410 fs/ioctl.c:144
       ni_fiemap+0xf57/0x1130 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:1934
       ntfs_fiemap+0x134/0x180 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1245
       ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:219 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0x187f/0x29a0 fs/ioctl.c:810
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl+0x83/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&ni->ni_lock/4){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x1898/0x6ae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831
       __lock_acquire+0x1292/0x1f60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
       lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1bd/0x26e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
       ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1108 [inline]
       attr_data_get_block+0x301/0x2370 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:917
       ntfs_file_mmap+0x48c/0x730 fs/ntfs3/file.c:387
       call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2204 [inline]
       mmap_region+0xfe6/0x1e20 mm/mmap.c:2625
       do_mmap+0x8d9/0xf30 mm/mmap.c:1412
       vm_mmap_pgoff+0x19e/0x2b0 mm/util.c:520
       ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x48c/0x6d0 mm/mmap.c:1458
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
                               lock(&ni->ni_lock/4);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
  lock(&ni->ni_lock/4);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor598/3631:
 #0: ffff888022a38898 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
 #0: ffff888022a38898 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x14d/0x2b0 mm/util.c:518

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 3631 Comm: syz-executor598 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00200-gc2bf05db6c78 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x1898/0x6ae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831
 __lock_acquire+0x1292/0x1f60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
 lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
 __mutex_lock_common+0x1bd/0x26e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
 ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1108 [inline]
 attr_data_get_block+0x301/0x2370 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:917
 ntfs_file_mmap+0x48c/0x730 fs/ntfs3/file.c:387
 call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2204 [inline]
 mmap_region+0xfe6/0x1e20 mm/mmap.c:2625
 do_mmap+0x8d9/0xf30 mm/mmap.c:1412
 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x19e/0x2b0 mm/util.c:520
 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x48c/0x6d0 mm/mmap.c:1458
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f250307bcf9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:

Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block

[syzbot]

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue:

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

Tested on:

commit:         c2bf05db Merge tag 'i2c-for-6.1-rc8' of git://git.kern..
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10ac7d47880000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2325e409a9a893e1
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9
compiler:       Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=14f9c10f880000

Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.

Re: [syzbot] fs/ntfs3: Do copy_to_user out of run_lock

[syzbot]

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.

***

Subject: fs/ntfs3: Do copy_to_user out of run_lock
Author: almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com

#syz test

--- a/fs/ntfs3/frecord.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/frecord.c
@@ -1898,6 +1898,47 @@ enum REPARSE_SIGN ni_parse_reparse(struct 
ntfs_inode *ni, struct ATTRIB *attr,
      return REPARSE_LINK;
  }

+/*
+ * fiemap_fill_next_extent_k - a copy of fiemap_fill_next_extent
+ * but it accepts kernel address for fi_extents_start
+ */
+static int fiemap_fill_next_extent_k(struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
+                     u64 logical, u64 phys, u64 len, u32 flags)
+{
+    struct fiemap_extent extent;
+    struct fiemap_extent __user *dest = fieinfo->fi_extents_start;
+
+    /* only count the extents */
+    if (fieinfo->fi_extents_max == 0) {
+        fieinfo->fi_extents_mapped++;
+        return (flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) ? 1 : 0;
+    }
+
+    if (fieinfo->fi_extents_mapped >= fieinfo->fi_extents_max)
+        return 1;
+
+    if (flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC)
+        flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNKNOWN;
+    if (flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_ENCRYPTED)
+        flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_ENCODED;
+    if (flags & (FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_TAIL | FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE))
+        flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED;
+
+    memset(&extent, 0, sizeof(extent));
+    extent.fe_logical = logical;
+    extent.fe_physical = phys;
+    extent.fe_length = len;
+    extent.fe_flags = flags;
+
+    dest += fieinfo->fi_extents_mapped;
+    memcpy(dest, &extent, sizeof(extent));
+
+    fieinfo->fi_extents_mapped++;
+    if (fieinfo->fi_extents_mapped == fieinfo->fi_extents_max)
+        return 1;
+    return (flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
  /*
   * ni_fiemap - Helper for file_fiemap().
   *
@@ -1908,6 +1949,8 @@ int ni_fiemap(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct 
fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
            __u64 vbo, __u64 len)
  {
      int err = 0;
+    struct fiemap_extent __user *fe_u = fieinfo->fi_extents_start;
+    struct fiemap_extent *fe_k = NULL;
      struct ntfs_sb_info *sbi = ni->mi.sbi;
      u8 cluster_bits = sbi->cluster_bits;
      struct runs_tree *run;
@@ -1955,6 +1998,18 @@ int ni_fiemap(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct 
fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
          goto out;
      }

+    /*
+     * To avoid lock problems replace pointer to user memory by pointer 
to kernel memory.
+     */
+    fe_k = kmalloc_array(fieinfo->fi_extents_max,
+                 sizeof(struct fiemap_extent),
+                 GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
+    if (!fe_k) {
+        err = -ENOMEM;
+        goto out;
+    }
+    fieinfo->fi_extents_start = fe_k;
+
      end = vbo + len;
      alloc_size = le64_to_cpu(attr->nres.alloc_size);
      if (end > alloc_size)
@@ -2043,8 +2098,9 @@ int ni_fiemap(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct 
fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
              if (vbo + dlen >= end)
                  flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST;

-            err = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, vbo, lbo, dlen,
-                              flags);
+            err = fiemap_fill_next_extent_k(fieinfo, vbo, lbo, dlen,
+                            flags);
+
              if (err < 0)
                  break;
              if (err == 1) {
@@ -2064,7 +2120,8 @@ int ni_fiemap(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct 
fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
          if (vbo + bytes >= end)
              flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST;

-        err = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, vbo, lbo, bytes, flags);
+        err = fiemap_fill_next_extent_k(fieinfo, vbo, lbo, bytes,
+                        flags);
          if (err < 0)
              break;
          if (err == 1) {
@@ -2077,7 +2134,19 @@ int ni_fiemap(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct 
fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,

      up_read(run_lock);

+    /*
+     * Copy to user memory out of lock
+     */
+    if (copy_to_user(fe_u, fe_k,
+             fieinfo->fi_extents_max *
+                 sizeof(struct fiemap_extent))) {
+        err = -EFAULT;
+    }
+
  out:
+    /* Restore original pointer. */
+    fieinfo->fi_extents_start = fe_u;
+    kfree(fe_k);
      return err;
  }

Re: [syzbot] possible fix

[syzbot]

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.

***

Subject: possible fix
Author: almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com

#syz test: https://github.com/Paragon-Software-Group/linux-ntfs3.git 
d57431c6f511bf020e474026d9f3123d7bfbea8c

Re: [syzbot]

[syzbot]

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.

***

Subject: 
Author: almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com

#syz test: https://github.com/Paragon-Software-Group/linux-ntfs3.git 
d57431c6f511bf020e474026d9f3123d7bfbea8c