From: syzbot <syzbot+9a5b0ced8b1bfb238b56@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: hdanton@sina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_fop_llseek
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 18:08:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000008885bc06153af8ef@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404004257.3933-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in kernfs_fop_llseek
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/5486 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807ec0b888 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_llseek+0x7e/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:867
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_inode_lock fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:649 [inline]
ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_llseek+0x28a/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:215
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
ovl_inode_lock_interruptible fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:654 [inline]
ovl_nlink_start+0xdc/0x390 fs/overlayfs/util.c:1162
ovl_do_remove+0x1fa/0xd90 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:893
vfs_rmdir+0x367/0x4c0 fs/namei.c:4209
do_rmdir+0x3b5/0x580 fs/namei.c:4268
__do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4287 [inline]
__se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4285 [inline]
__x64_sys_rmdir+0x49/0x60 fs/namei.c:4285
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
-> #1 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:803 [inline]
lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1708
walk_component+0x2e1/0x410 fs/namei.c:2004
lookup_last fs/namei.c:2461 [inline]
path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2485
filename_lookup+0x256/0x610 fs/namei.c:2514
kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2622
lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:1072
resume_store+0x1a0/0x710 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1235
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3a4/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
vfs_write+0xa84/0xcb0 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
-> #0 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
kernfs_fop_llseek+0x7e/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:867
ovl_llseek+0x335/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:219
vfs_llseek fs/read_write.c:289 [inline]
ksys_lseek fs/read_write.c:302 [inline]
__do_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:313 [inline]
__se_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:311 [inline]
__x64_sys_lseek+0x153/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:311
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&of->mutex --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> &ovl_i_lock_key[depth]
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]);
lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
lock(&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]);
lock(&of->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.0/5486:
#0: ffff8880707c8ac8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x259/0x320 fs/file.c:1191
#1: ffff888050981e80 (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
#1: ffff888050981e80 (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_llseek+0x277/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:207
#2: ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_inode_lock fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:649 [inline]
#2: ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_llseek+0x28a/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:215
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5486 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
kernfs_fop_llseek+0x7e/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:867
ovl_llseek+0x335/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:219
vfs_llseek fs/read_write.c:289 [inline]
ksys_lseek fs/read_write.c:302 [inline]
__do_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:313 [inline]
__se_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:311 [inline]
__x64_sys_lseek+0x153/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:311
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7fe1f567dde9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fe1f64370c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000008
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe1f57abf80 RCX: 00007fe1f567dde9
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fe1f56ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fe1f57abf80 R15: 00007ffe353f4cc8
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: fe46a7dd Merge tag 'sound-6.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel..
git tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=104e8475180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4d90a36f0cab495a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9a5b0ced8b1bfb238b56
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=1799f6ad180000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 18:23 [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_fop_llseek syzbot
2024-04-03 23:51 ` syzbot
2024-04-04 6:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-04 8:11 ` Al Viro
2024-04-04 8:21 ` Al Viro
2024-04-04 8:40 ` Al Viro
2024-04-04 9:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-04 22:01 ` Al Viro
2024-04-05 10:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-05 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-05 11:19 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-05 13:48 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-05 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-05 15:41 ` Tejun Heo
2024-04-06 3:54 ` Al Viro
2024-04-05 10:47 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-05 14:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-06 4:09 ` Al Viro
2024-04-06 5:25 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-05 15:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-05 15:37 ` syzbot
2024-04-05 16:23 ` Al Viro
2024-04-06 5:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-06 7:05 ` syzbot
2024-04-06 7:11 ` Al Viro
2024-04-06 8:23 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-07 0:48 ` Al Viro
2024-04-06 8:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-07 0:50 ` Al Viro
2024-04-07 11:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-09 9:18 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-04 0:42 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-04 1:08 ` syzbot [this message]
2024-04-04 2:12 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-04 2:39 ` syzbot
2024-04-05 23:00 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-05 23:02 ` syzbot
2024-04-06 0:10 ` Al Viro
2024-04-05 23:02 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-06 0:34 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000008885bc06153af8ef@google.com \
--to=syzbot+9a5b0ced8b1bfb238b56@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox