From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74799C4332F for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230017AbiKCHhf (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 03:37:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229523AbiKCHhb (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 03:37:31 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f69.google.com (mail-io1-f69.google.com [209.85.166.69]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A9E6374 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l9-20020a5d8f89000000b006bd33712128so583604iol.17 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:37:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:from:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=beK/RyAk6JMkokDhacR9sWsAak3KfcE5cJn8YM9YfXo=; b=319OVOM8ZO1HyRKcLqpPrto3TWAocDQNLFSN9YnEvmToNWjT3sAqdTJn4yJEjZz+Lz DpGEEgQHvt0F8Up2qhmpH1X31I+pERotfLBURuGmafok1zrtg+nw0xQwW0DKt7BxPPqp 0gI13wAc1iZMi3pS51MoZvccb+jVCswDngTPg9swd+w9LKSa/7mq70EbTF15Cqage0rA m+dmjLqkUjkPqKHG6+EFUpiNkVczw/T0pHdCUyG1R+Fsgd4Mbb+Rfyr69QA4nUdMkU08 YhEM8s/CiHY6UGS56kxdrX0vfp+QdzmfiSt4md142brOdb8NCAxBcj3hA5+hpt/mdPwD DLUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2f9rzVHBokMOktrhkP8yg1TjloELXD5T6VZdIXoUpPD6xnGay6 IyHLg3KK4fNWvDxcsPCT88BlP4MPZsY06Ou/U1LJ+i7IfEAj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6NRWzlYWEEtCXMvF48SMeGRIEr+NVWFycREnUUEq1I2ewxT3xofAG4HRdEx3hx6lj/gLeQxwJq2WJotVfyS2yP6bKlZYOB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f107:0:b0:6d3:a804:75bf with SMTP id e7-20020a6bf107000000b006d3a80475bfmr7577135iog.186.1667461050380; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:37:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <000000000000f2b07b05d5dc87cc@google.com> X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <00000000000095bae005ec8c0759@google.com> Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in fscache_free_cookie From: syzbot To: dhowells@redhat.com, dvyukov@google.com, linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com, linux-cachefs-owner@redhat.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mudongliangabcd@gmail.com, nogikh@google.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This bug is marked as fixed by commit: fscache: fix GPF in fscache_free_cookie But I can't find it in any tested tree for more than 90 days. Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying: #syz fix: exact-commit-title Until then the bug is still considered open and new crashes with the same signature are ignored.