linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+bef85a6996d1737c1a2f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: agordeev@linux.ibm.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
	davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,  kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,  tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	wenjia@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc_switch_to_fallback (2)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:15:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000ec1f6b061ba43f7d@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    568ebdaba637 MAINTAINERS: adjust file entry in FREESCALE Q..
git tree:       net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12f58a61980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e78fc116033e0ab7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=bef85a6996d1737c1a2f
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1d754ea220a6/disk-568ebdab.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/232f2545fca4/vmlinux-568ebdab.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6398bb41810d/bzImage-568ebdab.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+bef85a6996d1737c1a2f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc4-syzkaller-00875-g568ebdaba637 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/11818 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888023600a50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888023600258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1602 [inline]
ffff888023600258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_sendmsg+0x55/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2773

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3543
       do_ip_setsockopt+0x1a2d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
       ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       do_ip_setsockopt+0x127d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1077
       ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
       smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
       smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2779
       sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
       __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
       ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2585
       ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2639 [inline]
       __sys_sendmsg+0x2b0/0x3a0 net/socket.c:2668
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &smc->clcsock_release_lock --> rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
                               lock(rtnl_mutex);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
  lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.1/11818:
 #0: ffff888023600258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1602 [inline]
 #0: ffff888023600258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_sendmsg+0x55/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2773

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11818 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-syzkaller-00875-g568ebdaba637 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-24 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-24 15:15 syzbot [this message]
2024-07-27 17:46 ` [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc_switch_to_fallback (2) syzbot
2025-05-31 16:20 ` [syzbot] [smc?] " syzbot
2025-07-04 14:26 ` [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] " Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000ec1f6b061ba43f7d@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+bef85a6996d1737c1a2f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).