RE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate

["Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 729 bytes --]

> On 2012.06.22 07:03 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Doug, Charles,

> Can you both confirm that the below patch is what you tested and we
> should finally be able to close this issue?

[... patch code deleted ...]

Yes, I confirm that is the patch code I am testing, back edited to my
working environment (So far, I call this "peter35").

Some more test results are attached as PNG files and tests will
continue for at least another couple of days. I can comment
further on the "finally close this issue" question then, but it
looks very good so far.

Unless I find some issue, I won't push further results to this list,
But results can be pulled from [1].

[1] http://www.smythies.com/~doug/network/load_average/peter35.html


[-- Attachment #2: one_low_freq_low_load.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 34870 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: n_processes_peter35.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 44631 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: high_freq_3_8.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 51476 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: background_histograms.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 45925 bytes --]