From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263348AbUDMFQm (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:16:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263354AbUDMFQl (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:16:41 -0400 Received: from web02-imail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com ([66.185.86.76]:4843 "EHLO web02-imail.rogers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263348AbUDMFQi (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:16:38 -0400 From: "Shawn Starr" To: "'Jeff Garzik'" Cc: "'Len Brown'" , , Subject: RE: [BUG][2.6.5 final][e100/ee100pro] NETDEV_WATCHDOG Timeout -Related to i2c interface? Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:16:43 -0400 Message-ID: <000101c42116$82b8e910$0200080a@panic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4079B246.4070107@pobox.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at web02-imail.rogers.com from [69.196.108.95] using ID at Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:15:38 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Might be, I have since not had any issues with timeouts. Though, I don't know where it is doing this. It is an IBM machine so some things are proprietary. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Garzik Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 05:02 PM To: Shawn Starr Cc: 'Len Brown'; linux-kernel@; netdev@ Subject: Re: [BUG][2.6.5 final][e100/ee100pro] NETDEV_WATCHDOG Timeout -Related to i2c interface? Shawn Starr wrote: > Ok, this is strange, I put in an external 10/100 PRO S Adaptor, and im > not getting anymore eth0 timeouts, I would only get eth0 timeouts on > the ONBOARD nic if I enabled the lm80 sensor driver.. I don't know > what to say, the onboard nic would work fine without lm80 being > loaded? > > Is there some sort of race condition that the onboard 10/100 PRO is > doing ? If i2c is killing the network, sounds like it's diddling something on the motherboard it shouldn't... Jeff