From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264959AbUELDNc (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 23:13:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264958AbUELDNc (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 23:13:32 -0400 Received: from host213-123-250-229.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.123.250.229]:27693 "EHLO 2003SERVER.sbs2003.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265012AbUELDMq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 23:12:46 -0400 thread-index: AcQ3z3EibDfYC46bRxuORkeQJsOdAQ== X-Sieve: Server Sieve 2.2 Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 04:15:56 +0100 From: "Daniel Jacobowitz" To: Cc: , , Message-ID: <000101c437cf$71227ca0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mail-Followup-To: Matt Porter ,benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org References: <20040511170150.A4743@home.com> <20040511175750.12bad316.akpm@osdl.org> <000101c437c2$d7467ac0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000101c437c2$d7467ac0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Mailing-List: X-Loop: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Envelope-to: paul@sumlocktest.fsnet.co.uk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 X-me-spamlevel: not-spam X-me-spamrating: 2.641677 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2004 03:15:57.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[713F0550:01C437CF] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:45:44AM +0100, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:57:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Matt Porter wrote: > > > > > > New OCP infrastructure ported from 2.4 along with several > > > enhancements. Please apply. > > > > I only received patch 1/2. > > > > Could you please avoid using the same Subject: for different patches? It > > confuses my auto-subject-to-patch-filename-munger and it's nice to more > > specifically identify each patch anwyay. > > Oddly I sent unique subjects: > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PPC32: PPC4xx updates for new OCP > > It appears 2/2 at least made it off my system to the remote mailer, > will doublecheck. Your mail is being duplicated by what looks like a broken news gateway, or something similar, on linuxppc-dev: Received: from host213-123-250-229.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.123.250.229]:15149 "EHLO 2003SERVER.sbs2003.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264904AbUELBme (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:42:34 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by 2003SERVER.sbs2003.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 12 May 2004 02:45:44 +0100 > > -Matt > > > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/