Re: [PATCH hyperv-next] x86/hyperv: Fix APIC ID and VP ID confusion in hv_snp_boot_ap()

[Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>]

On 4/27/2025 5:48 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 04:55:42PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:

[...]

>>>
>>> I appreciate your help with the precision. I used loose language,
>>> agreed, would like to fix that. The patch was applied though but not yet
>>> sent to the Linus'es tree as I understand. I'd appreciate guidance on
>>> the process! Should I send a v2 nevertheless and explain the situation
>>> in the cover letter?
>>>
>>> IOW, how do I make this easier for the maintainer(s)?
>>
>> Wei Liu should give his preferences. But in the past, I think he has
>> just replaced a patch that was updated. If that's the case, you can
>> send a v2 without a lot of additional explanation.
>>
> 
> Normally if you need to send a new version because the original
> patch is buggy, you can just update your patch.
> 
> If only a commit message or comment needs to be updated, I will let the
> submitter know either to send a new version or not. Sometimes I will
> just make the changes myself to save the submitter some time.
> 

Very kind of you, thanks a lot for the explanation!

> Wei.

-- 
Thank you,
Roman