public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: "'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "'Yong Zhang'" <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	"'Charles Wang'" <muming.wq@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"'Tao Ma'" <tm@tao.ma>, '含黛' <handai.szj@taobao.com>,
	"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"'Doug Smythies'" <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:01:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000701cd5935$43eebab0$cbcc3010$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001cd5252$b47d2a30$1d777e90$@net>


>> On 2012.06.22 07:03 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>  On 2012.06.24 14:46 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:

>> Doug, Charles,

>> Can you both confirm that the below patch is what you tested and we
>> should finally be able to close this issue?

> [... patch code deleted ...]

> Yes, I confirm that is the patch code I am testing, back edited to my
> working environment (So far, I call this "peter35").

> Some more test results are attached as PNG files and tests will
> continue for at least another couple of days. I can comment
> further on the "finally close this issue" question then, but it
> looks very good so far.

> Unless I find some issue, I won't push further results to this list,
> But results can be pulled from [1].

> [1] http://www.smythies.com/~doug/network/load_average/peter35.html

I have finished my testing of Peter's proposed patch (my reference:
"peter35")
I don't claim that the testing was exhaustive, but I do claim that it was
pretty thorough.

Yes, In my opinion, we can finally close this issue.
Thanks.




  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-03 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09 10:54 [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-11 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]   ` <4FD6BFC4.1060302@gmail.com>
2012-06-12  8:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12  9:34   ` Charles Wang
2012-06-12  9:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13  5:55       ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13  7:56         ` Charles Wang
2012-06-14  4:41           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-14 15:42             ` Charles Wang
2012-06-16  6:42               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13  8:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 15:33           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13 21:57             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14  3:13               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 10:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-20 19:24         ` sched: care and feeding of load-avg code (Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate) Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-15 14:27       ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-15 17:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-16 14:53           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18  6:41             ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 14:41               ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 10:06           ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 16:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19  6:08           ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-19  9:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 15:50               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-20  9:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-21  4:12                   ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-21  6:35                     ` Charles Wang
2012-06-21  8:48                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-22 14:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-24 21:45                       ` Doug Smythies
2012-07-03 16:01                         ` Doug Smythies [this message]
2012-06-25  2:15                       ` Charles Wang
2012-07-06  6:19                       ` [tip:sched/core] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19  6:19           ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Doug Smythies
2012-06-19  6:24           ` Charles Wang
2012-06-19  9:57             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000701cd5935$43eebab0$cbcc3010$@net' \
    --to=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muming.wq@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox