public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sean Cavanaugh" <seanc@gearboxsoftware.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: The new X-Kernel !
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 16:38:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000801c15a78$b79a4280$150a10ac@gearboxsoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011021220346.D19390@vega.digitel2002.hu>

This side thread is funny, everyone here is thinking too much like a
developer :)

Normal users really don't need to see the startup message spam on boot,
unless there is an error (at which point it should be able to present
the error to the user).  Any kind of of progress indicator' s really
more for feedback that the boot is proceeding ok.  The fact the boot
sequence isn't even interactive should also be a big hint that it isn't
really necessary (except for kernel and driver developers).

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Gábor Lénárt
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:04 PM
To: john slee
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The new X-Kernel !


On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 01:37:47AM +1000, john slee wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:54:15PM +0200, Tim Jansen wrote:
> > But what the kernel COULD do is include something like the Linux 
> > Progress
> > Patch (http://lpp.freelords.org/). It replaces the text output of
the kernel 
> > with graphics and a progress bar, so people are not frightened by
cryptic 
> > text output while booting.
> 
> this is something for distributions to do...  even if the world turned

> inside out and it got included there'd be endless flamewars (and
> patches) concerning what colour the progress bar should be by default.
> 
> i read an interesting essay about that sort of thing on a freebsd list

> once - search on freebsd archives for "garden shed" or similar.

Errrm ;-) It's very bad thing to hide boot messages even for novice
users. They can't bugreport in this way ... I thing the best way would
be the penguin logo at the top, and some pixel progress bar under Tux.
The messages should remain IMHO. But this bar indicator confuses me. How
do you calculate the remaining percentage? And of course this is kernel
boot only. After init, you can start costum process to show an indicator
bar to messure remaining tasks before hitting
xdm/kdm/gdm/login/whatever.

But IMHO *hiding* kernel messages is the worst thing you can do ...
Probably a versatile parameterable boot logo + indicator setting tool
should be implemented (and of course the right code to the kernel to
render them on startup). It can include (let's say:)

position and size of text area inside the screen (kernel messages)
background picture progress bar indicator attributes, position

and so on

Again: I'm AGAINST this stupid thing but if many user wants  ... However
HIDING kernel messages would be bad move ....

Major distributions include default kernels patched for nice boot
screens, so IMHO it isn't an issue for us. A user how can COMPILE kernel
himself probably does not want gfx-only boot screens .... or at least he
can patch kernel before compile it.

- Gabor
-


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-21 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-20 21:30 The new X-Kernel ! MichaelM
2001-10-20 21:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-21  0:08 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-10-21  7:37 ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-21  8:33   ` Jonathan Morton
2001-10-21  8:50     ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-21  9:13       ` Jonathan Morton
2001-10-21 17:06         ` James Simmons
2001-10-21 10:26     ` Allan Sandfeld
2001-10-21 14:19       ` Alan Cox
2001-10-21 17:18         ` James Simmons
2001-10-21 17:26           ` Alan Cox
2001-10-21 17:40             ` James Simmons
2001-10-21 19:17               ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-22  0:10                 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-10-22  0:37                   ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-22 17:18                   ` James Simmons
2001-10-22 16:51                 ` James Simmons
2001-10-22 18:35                   ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-23  7:05                     ` Allan Sandfeld
2001-10-21 19:53               ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-22 17:04                 ` James Simmons
2001-10-23  6:45     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-10-21 12:54   ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-21 15:37     ` john slee
2001-10-21 19:04       ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-21 20:03       ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-21 21:06         ` LPP (was: The new X-Kernel !) Tim Jansen
2001-10-21 21:22         ` The new X-Kernel ! Federico Sevilla III
2001-10-21 21:31           ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-21 21:38         ` Sean Cavanaugh [this message]
2001-10-21 21:52           ` Alan Cox
2001-10-21 22:39             ` Oden Eriksson
2001-10-22  4:44             ` Sean Cavanaugh
2001-10-21 21:53           ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-21 22:19             ` LPP (was: The new X-Kernel !) Tim Jansen
2001-10-22  0:28               ` Jakob Østergaard
2001-10-22  0:57                 ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-22  8:34                   ` Abraham vd Merwe
2001-10-22  0:24                     ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-10-23 20:50                       ` Petr Baudis
2001-10-30  2:18                         ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-10-22  9:37                     ` Sunil Phatak
2001-10-22  9:47                       ` Abraham vd Merwe
2001-10-22 14:33                     ` MichaelM
2001-10-22 19:13                       ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-22 11:42                 ` David Relson
2001-10-21 22:14         ` The new X-Kernel ! Leo Spalteholz
2001-10-22  5:17           ` Jonathan Morton
2001-10-21 16:09     ` Malcolm H. Teas
2001-10-21 19:04       ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-21 19:13   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2001-10-21 19:30     ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-21 19:49     ` J Sloan
2001-10-21 21:12     ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-21 21:20       ` D. Stimits
2001-10-21 21:41         ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-10-22  5:42 ` Dwayne C. Litzenberger
2001-10-31 17:34 ` Jim Freeman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-21 21:44 Samium Gromoff
2001-10-21 22:01 ` Gábor Lénárt
     [not found] <fa.fbu5gjv.1526gp4@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.ltbaijv.13jgcr7@ifi.uio.no>
2001-10-22  1:14   ` Dan Maas
2001-10-22  8:09     ` Alan Cox
2001-10-22 17:56 Jesse Pollard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000801c15a78$b79a4280$150a10ac@gearboxsoftware.com' \
    --to=seanc@gearboxsoftware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox