public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Manfred Spraul" <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "Roger Larsson" <roger.larsson@norran.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Robert Love" <rml@tech9.net>,
	<nigel@nrg.org>
Subject: Re: [SMP lock BUG?] Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 01:11:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000901c138bb$8e151270$010411ac@local> (raw)

> This is interesting. [Assumes UP Athlon - correct]
> Note that all BUGs out in highmem.h:95 (kmap_atomic)
> and that test is only on if you have enabled HIGHMEM_DEBUG
> [my analyze is done with a 2.4.10-pre2 kernel, but I checked with
> later patches and I do not think they fix it either...]
>
> The preemptive kernel puts more SMP stress on the kernel than
> running with multiple CPUs.
>
> So this might be a potential bug in the kernel proper, running with
> a SMP computer.

No.
It seems to be a missing ctx_sw_off() in highmem.h:
kmap_atomic uses a per-cpu variable, thus ctx_sw_off() is needed in
kmap_atomic, and ctx_sw_on() in kunmap_atomic().

--
    Manfred




             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-08 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-08 23:11 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-09-09  3:44 ` [SMP lock BUG?] Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch Robert Love
2001-09-09  7:38   ` Manfred Spraul
     [not found]   ` <001a01c1390262c7f30/mnt/sendme10411ac@local>
2001-09-14  9:15     ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-17 22:40       ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-18  0:19         ` Robert Love
2001-09-17 22:41       ` Robert Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-08 17:33 Arjan Filius
2001-09-08 20:58 ` [SMP lock BUG?] " Roger Larsson
2001-09-08 22:18   ` Arjan Filius
2001-09-09 14:55   ` george anzinger
2001-09-09 22:25     ` Arjan Filius

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000901c138bb$8e151270$010411ac@local' \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=roger.larsson@norran.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox