From: "Sampson Fung" <sampson@attglobal.net>
To: "'John Bradford'" <john@grabjohn.com>,
"'Sampson Fung'" <sampson.fung@attglobal.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels.
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 02:30:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01c2a91f$01324ff0$0100a8c0@noelpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212211816.gBLIG3NV000880@darkstar.example.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of John Bradford
> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 2:08 AM
> To: Sampson Fung
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels.
>
>
> > From v2.5.49 up, I can only test the compiled kernel, if it
> compiles
> > at all, with modules disabled completely. Of course, I have to say
> > that I do not try much before v2.5.49.
> >
> > I think new comers, myselft included, can make use of standard
> > templates of kernel .config file.
>
> Try a minimal configuration, or the default one, (which is
> whatever Linus uses). Avoid modular IDE for now.
>
Where is the default .config? I am eager to have a try.
> > First of all, "standard templates" are tested that they will be
> > compiled without problem. They should be able to boot.
> > They should have a working "framework" of "modules", for
> example, lsmod
> > works without any problem. (And any other "required"
> modutils as well)
> > They shuold supports further kernel compile. (With small incremental
> > changes to the base "standard template").
>
> Sounds like an excellent job for a new kernel hacker to take on board
> - why not make the standard templates yourself, and post them
> to the list for each 2.5.x tree. It *would* be quite useful,
> and save a lot of developers' time, for example, it would
> stop a lot of people complaining about modular IDE.
>
I can post my config as I am using common hardware config.
But I cannot make the "framework" of "modules" working for me.
> > Then I can try to compile my lan card as modules.
> > Then try to compile my SCSI card, etc, etc.
> >
> > Does similar "standard templates" exist already?
>
> No.
>
> > Where can I search for known bugs centrally, so that I can
> help myself
> > as much as possible?
>
> * The mailing list archives
> * Kernel Bugzilla
> * (hopefully in a week or so) my new bug database which I am currently
> writing.
>
> John.
Sampson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-21 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-21 17:57 How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels Sampson Fung
2002-12-21 18:16 ` John Bradford
2002-12-21 18:30 ` Sampson Fung [this message]
2002-12-21 19:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-12-21 20:35 ` First Bug Found : " Sampson Fung
2002-12-21 21:23 ` John Bradford
2002-12-21 21:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-12-21 22:18 ` John Bradford
2002-12-24 13:33 ` Additional Bug Found--RE: " Sampson Fung
2002-12-21 19:15 ` John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000b01c2a91f$01324ff0$0100a8c0@noelpc' \
--to=sampson@attglobal.net \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sampson.fung@attglobal.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox